Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

Winter 1-29-2019

Citation

Ahmadian, fahimeh; ChandrashekaraوM. (2018) Research challenges and delayed gratification in information seeking behavior: a case study of research scholars,Library, Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2028/

Ashrafi Rizi H, Kazempour Z, Papi (2010). A Survey of Publications by Non-Government, Special Publishers in Library and Information Science during (2001-2008). Library and Information Science, 13(2): 295-318. [In Persian

Amraei M, Geraei E, Siamaki (2013) S. Subject Trends of Persian Publications in LIS, 1994-2008. NASTINFO , 24(3): 78-91. [In Persian].

Bhardwaj, Raj Kumar (2012). Research activities of library and information science professionals in Indian higher educational institutions: Competencies, support and engagements, Journal of Library and Information Technology, 37(1), pp. 30-37

Boell, Sebastian K.; Kennan, Mary Anne; Willard, Patricia (2012). Fifty years of LIS education in Australia: Research productivity and visibility of LIS educators in higher education institutions, Journal of Education in Library and Information Science. 53(1). 49-68

Chuan , Chen ; qin ,fu,Ma Hao(2011).Survey Research on Implementation of Research Methods in Library and Information Science, Library Tribune,31(6.Rretrieved March 18 ,2018,fromhttp://www.jlis.cn/jtlscen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20120203&fCorbin, Juliet; & Strauss, Anselm. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4 edition). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Boston: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, John W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Michigan: Merrill.

Creswell, John W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Michigan:

Diani, Hussein (2008.) Thesis, Unknown Treasure. Journal of Library and Information Science, 2 (4) 1-16. Diani, Mohammad Hussein (2008). Problem solving and decline in problem solving in library and information research, 41 (1), 1-3.

Dani, Mohammad Hussein (2008). Increasing the profile of bibliographic and informational articles. Library and Information Science .11 (3).

Fattahi, Rahmatullah; Rajabali Baghloo; Reza; Akhashik; Somayeh Sadat (1393). Transition and Opinion, Present and Future: Library and Information Science in Iran: A Look at the Formation, Achievements and Challenges of the Development of Information Science and Dentistry. Shiraz: Persian letter: Ministry of Science and Technology Research and Technology Vice-Chancellor of Research Center for Information Science and Technology

Ganji, Alireza (2004) Study of the status of scientific information generation of Faculty Members of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Master's degree. Faculty of Educational Sciences Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Heidari, Gholamreza; Ghandadi Nejad, Farzaneh; Chini Pardaz, Rahim (2017). Identifying and Analyzing the Priorities of Research in Information Science and Dentistry from the Point of View of Ph.D. Professors and Students in this Field, Information Management, 3 (1) 49-73

Malek Mohammadi Saeed; Haji Zainalabedini, Mohsen (1396). A decade of book publishing in the field of information science and science of Iran, 2002-2011, Journal of Information Technology, Novin Medical Sciences, 3 (1) 16-21.Merrill...Rretrieved,May 21,2018,fromhttps://books.google.com/books/about/Educational_Research.html?id=IXcOAQAAMAAJ

Ocholla , Dennis N; Ocholla ,Lyudmilla(2007)Research in Library and Information Science in South Africa: an analysis of journal research output from 1993-2006. 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL, 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa.Electronic .Rretrieved March 18 ,2018,from http://www.ifla.org/iv/ifla73/index.htm

Osareh, Farideh, Faraj Pahloo, Abdolhossein, Siamaki, Saba (1393). Information and Knowledge Science in Iran: Content Analysis, Caspian Scientology Magazine, 1 (2) 7-13..

Radfar A(2012). A Survey on the Library and Information Science Researches in Iran, Epistemology ,5(18): 35-49. [In Persian].

Strauss,A.,& Corbin,J.(1990).Basics of qualitative research:Grounded theory procedures and techniques.new bury park,CA:sage

Powell, Ronald, AR (2000). Essential Research Methods for Librarians. Najla Hariri (Translator). Tehran: Scientific Publications Center of Islamic Azad University Hassanzadeh, Mohammad; Osbaktabar, Mostafa, Sohrabzadeh, Sara; Mohammadi Zaron, Masoumeh. (2017). The Relationship Between Writing and Quality of Papers: An Approach to Published Articles in the Field of Information Science and Dentistry from 2009 to 2015. Research Methodology. Terms of Acceptance.

Zarei, Atefe; Famil Rouhani, Ali Akbar (2009). The research status of faculty members of Islamic Azad Universities in the 5th District and Identification of their Problems in Scientific Production, National Library Studies and Information Organization, No. 80

Comments

Dear Professor Mary K. Bolin,

Editor-in-Chief, Library Philosophy and Practice

On behalf of my co-author, I am pleased to submit a new manuscript entitled “Challenges and problems of Library and Information Science Research ” for consideration by Library Philosophy and Practice.

We believe that the manuscript is appropriate for publication by your world-class International Journal, Library Philosophy and Practice as this journal publishes both qualitative and quantitative types of research on issues on Challenges and problems of concern to research in library and information science.

It is considered that our manuscript can be a good point of departure for future studies regarding this issue in different universities around the world. Also, it can be useful for LIS professionals, higher education policy-makers and managers and makers of standards and ethics in research, practice and education in future planning of library and information science and other societies on the globe.

Hereby I confirm that this manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. I guarantee that I have checked that no plagiarism has occurred in the present manuscript and all original references have been read, studied, and cited. I confirm that all figures, tables, or schemes are original and are created by authors of this manuscript unless otherwise stated and then official permission has been obtained from authors and the publisher.

I attest to the fact that all authors listed on the title page have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission to the Library Philosophy and Practic. I confirm that instruction for authors of this journal has been read carefully and all points are compiled for the whole manuscript.

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose, and all authors agree with the contents of the manuscript.

Please address all correspondence concerning this manuscript to me at rezazadehzahra@gmail.com. Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely,

Zahra Rezazadeh

Corresponding Author

Authors: Prof. Zohreh Mirhosseini

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors of Challenges and problems of Library and Information Science Research from the perspective of field specialists in Iran .This study examines one of these experiences to explanation conditions and strategies necessary for the success of such experience. This research, on the other hand has tried to clarify factors that affect on research .The method of the study is grounded theory. The survey was adopted for data collection through Deep and semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect information with 13 knowledge and science experts selected by mixed or mixed purpose sampling. After three steps of coding (Strauss & Corbin, 1998), the central phenomenon of the study was identified: " Research pathology in knowledge and information science” . Then paradigmatic model was developed. The results show that Human challenges ,Lack of time management, Financial crisis ,Lack of research popularity, Weak research structure, Lack of commitment ,Problem making ,Duplication, Lack of strategic planning are the most important affecting the phenomenon. four main outcome of this phenomenon is Implementation,Nativism ,Empowering information consultation and Research empowerment.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.