Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., Roychoudhury, S., Homa, S., Puchalt, N.G., Ramasamy, R., Majzoub, A., Ly, K.D., Tvrda, E., Assidi, M., Kesari, K., Sharma, R., Banihani, S., Ko, E., Abu-Elmagd, M., Gosalvez, J. and Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking Research Impact by Selecting the Appropriate Metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(2), 296–309.
  2. Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K. (2015). Web Indicators for Research Evaluation. Part 1: Citations and Links to Academic Articles from the Web. El Profesional de La Información, 24(5), 1699–2407.
  3. Naidu, Giri. P. (2017). Google Scholar Research Impact on DESIDOC Journal of Library &Information Technology: Citation Analysis. International Journal of Library and Information Studies,7(1), 168-175.
  4. Singh, Ravi Kant and Singh, A.P. (2017). Citation Analysis of International Journal of Library and InformationStudies on the Impact Research of Google Scholar: 2011-2015. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 7(4), 155-161.
  5. Swapan Kumar Patra. (2014). Google Scholar-based citation analysis of Indian library and information science journals. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61(3), 227-234.
  6. Garg, K.C. and Bebi. (2014). A citation study of Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS) and DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (DJLIT). Annals of Library and Information Studies. 61(3), 212-216.
  7. Renjith, V. R. (2018). Citations of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology: Statistical Analysis of Google Scholar Based Research Impact for the Period of 2006 to 2015. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Available at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1936.
  8. Tarazona, B., Lucas-Dominguez, R., Paredes-Gallardo, V., Alonso-Arroyo, A., and Vidal-Infer, A. (2018). The 100 most cited articles in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. The Angle Orthodontist, 88(6), 785–96. Available at https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1
  9. Fardi, A., Kodonas, K., Gogos, C., and Economides, N. (2011). Top cited articles in endodontic journals. Journal of Endodontics, 37(9), 1183–90. Available at doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037.
  10. Gondivkar, S.M., Sarode, S.C., Gadbail, A.R., Gondivkar, R.S., Chole, R., and Sarode, G.S. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of 100 most cited articles on oral submucous fibrosis. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 47(8), 781–787. Available at doi: 10.1111/jop.12742.
  11. Ahmad, P., Dummer, P.M.H., Noorani, T.Y., and Asif, J.A.(2019). The top 50 most cited articles published in the International Endodontic Journal. International Endodontic Journal. Available at DOI:10.1111/iej.13083.

Abstract

Google Scholar (GS), a freely accessible database of scholarly papers along with its citations data, has an extensive coverage of Library and Information Science (LIS) literature. It is the only available global database for the citation analysis of Indian LIS journals. The present study is an attempt to highlight the authorship pattern and citation level of i10 cited research articles in DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (DJLIT) based on Google Scholar data. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were applied in the study. One hundred and eighty articles published between 1995–2016 were cited 10 or more times (i10 index) in Google Scholar. Based on Google Scholar, this study has established that citations of i10 cited papers are equally distributed in its different authorship patterns; there is no association between authorship pattern and level of citations. Further the study shows that there is an association between period of publication and level of citations.

Download

Share

COinS