Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln



Ajiferuke, I., Q. Burell, and Jean Tague. 1955. Collaborative Coefficient: A Single Measure of the Degree of Collaboration in Research. Scientometrics, Vol. 14, no.5-6: 421-433.

Chaman M. 2016. Bibliometric Study of Ph.D. Theses in Library and Information Science as Through INFLIBNET-Soudhganga. International Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 5, no. 12: 850-852.

Elango, B. 2017. Scientometric Analysis of Nature Nanotechnology. Library Hi Tech News, Vol. 34 no. 1: 17-23.

Ezema, Ifeanyi J., and B. E. Asogwa. 2014. Citation Analysis and Authorship Patterns of Two Linguistics Journals. Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 14, no. 1: 67-86.

Fry, T. D., J. M.Donohue, B. A. Saladin, and G. Shang. 2013. The Origins of Research and Patterns of Authorship in the International Journal of Production Research. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 51, no. 23-24: 7470-7500.

Lawani, S. M. 1980. Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study. Diss. Florida State University.

Machado M., Alexander, Noelia Jiménez-Fanjul, and Maria José Madrid. 2015. Collaboration in the Iberoamerican Journals in the Category Information Science & Library Science WOS. Library Philosophy and Practice 1270 : 1-9.

Paul-Hus, Adele et al.2017. The Sum of it all: Revealing Collaboration Patterns by Combining Authorship and Acknowledgements. Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 11,no. 1: 80-87.

Rajgoli, Iqbalahmad U., and AshalathaLaxminarsaiah. 2017. Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research in the Field of Spacecraft Technology. The Electronic Library, Vol. 33, no. 4: 1-20.

Rani, Sudha Y.,and K. Nagaraju. 2013. Webology: A Bibliometric Analysis. e-Library Science Research Journal, Vol. 2, no.1: 1-7.

Rattan, Gurjeet Kaur. 2013. Acknowledgement Patterns in Annals of Library and Information Studies 1999-2012. Library Philosophy and Practice 989.

Sarvanur, K. and R. Srikanth. 2010. Modified Collaboration Coefficient: A New Measure for Quantifying the Degree of Research Collaboration. Scientometrics, Vol. 84 : 365-376.

Shivcharan and Sandeep Kumar. 2015. Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research Trends in the Field of Library and Information Science. Indian Streams Research Journal, Vol.5, no. 8: 1-7.

Subramanyam, K. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Sciences, Vol. 6, no. 1: 33-38.

Thavamani, K. 2014. Authorship and Collaborative Patterns in the Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 1996-2013. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journalol, Vol. 37: 1-14.

Thavamani, K. 2015. A Study of Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in Collaborative Librarianship, 2009-2014. Collaborative Librarianship, Vol. 7, no.5: 84-95.

Velmurugan, C. 2013. Bibliometric Analysis with Special Reference to Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research Output of Annals of Library and Information Studies for the Year 2007- 2012. International Journal of Digital Library Services, Vol. 3, no.3: 13-21.


This article presents the analysis of collaboration pattern for the articles published in the journal: Malasian Journal of Library and Information Science during the period 2011-2015. Several indicators of collaboration including authorship pattern, collaboration index, degree of collaboration, and collaboration coefficient has been studied. Average authors per paper, productivity per author, most prolific authors, single authored and multi-authored articles are investigated. During the period of study MJLIS has published 110 articles by 289 authors, out of which 18 single authored, 42 double authored, 33 triple authored, 9 four author, 3 five author and 5 more than 5 authored papers have been contributed. The average degree of collaboration is 0.83, average collaboration index is 2.67, average coefficient of collaboration is 0.51, and average modified collaboration coefficient is 0.53 during the five years 2011-2015. Bibliometrics (43 times) Information literacy(11), Library use (12), Information seeking (10)and Malaysia (8) anr the most used keywords. The most productive institutes are found to be University of Malaya, Malaysia (60),Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (17), Islamic Azad University, Iran (13)and Universiti Sains Malaysia (12).The top four most prolific authors are A Abrizah with 10 (3.39%) articles, A Zainab with 9 papers, N H Abdul Karim and S A Saani each with five papers. Average authors per paper (AAPP) during the five years are found to be 2.57,2.9, 2.63, 2.25, 2.80 . It was found that there are 38 inter-institute collaborations, 34 are intra institute collaborations and 25 international collaborations.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.