Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Merton, R. K. The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 1968, 159 (3810), 6-63.
  1. Kuhn, T, The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago. University of Chicago, 1970, 2(2) 1970.
  1. Orduña Malea, E, Ayllón, J. M, Martín-Martín, A & Delgado López-Cózar, E. Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 2015, 104, 931–949. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s1119 2-015-1614-6 (accessed on 7 January 2019)
  1. 4. Mayr, P & Walter, A.K. An exploratory study of Google Scholar. Online

Information Review, 2007, 31 814–830. https ://doi.org/10.1108/14684 52071 08417 84 (accessed on 7 January 2019).

  1. Aguillo & Isidro. Is google scholar useful for bibliometrics? A Webometrics analysis, Scientometrics, 2010, 91(2), 343-351.
  1. Khabsa, M & Giles, C. L. The number of scholarly documents on the public

web. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9 1–6. https ://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pone.00939 49 ( accessed on 7 January 2019).

  1. de Solla Price D. Science, technology, and society: a cross-disciplinary perspective Spiegel-Rosing I, de Solla Price D, eds, SAGE, 1977.
  1. Garfield, E. The mystery of the transposed journal lists—Wherein Bradford’s Law of

Scattering is generalized according to Garfield’s Law of Concentration. Current Contents, 1971, 3(33).

  1. de Granda-Orive JI, et al. Spanish productivity in smoking research relative to world and European union productivity from 1999 through 2003, analyzed with the Science Citation Index]. Arch Bronconeumol, 2007, 43, 212–218.
  1. Karin Vitzthum, et.al. Scientometric Analysis and Combined Density-

Equalizing Mapping of Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Research, PLoS ONE, 2010, 5, 1-10.

  1. Jeyasekar, J, J & Saravanan P. Journal of forensic sciences: A Bibliometric study for the period 2006 to 2010. National Conference on Scientometrics and Knowledge Management, Dharwad India, 2013.
  1. Thomson Reuters. ISI web of knowledge, science citation index expanded, social

science citation index, web of science, 2008. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/ISI_Web_of_Knowledge (accessed 7 January 2019).

  1. Thomson Reuters. (2008b). Conference proceedings citation index, 2008.

http://www.thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/Conf_Proceedings_CitationIndex (accessed 7 January 2019).

  1. Adriaanse, L & Rensleigh, C. Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. The Electronic Library, 2013, 31(6), 727–744.
  1. Bornmann, L, Thor A Marx, W & Schier, H. The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67 (11), 2778–2789.
  1. Baskaran, C. Research Productivity of Alagappa University during 1999-2010: A Bibliometric study. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 2013, 3(3), 236-242.
  1. Baskaran, C. Research productivity of enzymes literature: A Scientometric

Study. International Journal of Library Science and Information Management, 2015, 1, 17-25.

  1. Sivakami, N & Baskaran C. A Scientometric analysis of Research productivity in Swine flue. International Journal of Library and Information studies, 2014, 4(4).

19. Baskaran, C. Publication meant for highly quality research through LIS in India: The Special Reference to DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (DJLIT). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2018, 11-20-2018. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2031. ( accessed on 20 December 2018).

  1. Saravanan, S & Baskaran, C. Mapping of Bioremediation Research Output in

India: A Scientometric Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2018. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2038/.(accessed on 7January 2019).

  1. Teixeira da Silva, J A & Dobranszki, J. Multiple versions of the h-index: Cautionary use

for formal academic purposes. Scientometrics, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2680-3 (accessed on 8 January 2019).

  1. Bradford , S. C. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 1934, 137 85–86.
  1. Baskaran, C and Rameshbabu, P. (PDF) The substantial research on Quantitative analysis and Publications measure in Forensic Medicine. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330212593_The_substantial_research_on_Quantitative_analysis_and_Publications_measure_in_Forensic_Medicine (accessed on Jan 11 2019).

Comments

-

Abstract

The proposed study aims to analyze that Citations and h-Index variations analyzed based on records of Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar Metrics (GSM). The citations and h-Index for research credential of the faculty members in Alagappa University based on both WoS and GSM during 1989-2018. It is found form the analysis the highest output of 262(10.90%) of the publications. in the year 2018, whereas citations found to be 298 for h-Index only 7 acquired by the whole faculty members of Alagappa University for the year 2018. It is analyzed maximum 290 (12.20%) of the publications contributed by the researchers from Central Electro chemical Research Institute was highly collaborated with Alagappa Universities , which has top Citations and h-Index 3852 and 32 respectively. The propounded according to Google Scholar Metrics (GSM) SK Pandian was to be a top ranked researcher, despite his year wise citations shows 4491 and h-Index credited 36 during 2008-2018.

Download

Share

COinS