Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version



  1. Elsayed, A. M. (2016). The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34, 378–391. doi: 10.1177/0894439315589146 .
  2. Goodwin, S., Jeng, W., and He, D. (2014). “Changing communication on ResearchGate through interface updates,” in Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T 2014) Annual Meeting, 31 October−5 November (Seattle, WA). doi: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101129
  3. Jeng, W., DesAutels, S., He, D., and Li, L. (2017). Information exchange on an academic social networking site: a multidiscipline comparison on Researchgate Q&A. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 68, 638–652. doi: 10.1002/asi.23692
  4. Jeng, W., He, D., and Jiang, J. (2015). User participation in an academic social networking service: a survey of open group users on Mendeley. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 66, 890–904. doi: 10.1002/asi.23225
  5. Jeng, W., He, D., and Jiang, J. (2015). User participation in an academic social networking service: a survey of open group users on Mendeley. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 66, 890–904. doi: 10.1002/asi.23225.
  6. Jordan K (2019) From Social Networks to Publishing Platforms: A Review of the History and Scholarship of Academic Social Network Sites. Front. Digit. Humanit. 6:5. doi: 10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005.
  7. Jordan, K. (2017a). Academic social networking sites timeline. figshare. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1460787.v1
  8. Laakso, M., Lindman, J., Shen, L. C.„ Nyman, L., and Björk, B.-C. (2017). Research output availability on academic social networks: implications for stakeholders in academic publishing. Electr. Markets 27, 125–133. doi: 10.1007/s12525-016-0242-1
  9. Li, L., He, D., Jeng, W., Goodwin, S., and Zhang, C. (2015). “Answer quality characteristics and prediction on an academic Q&A site: a case study on ResearchGate,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 18–22 May (Florence). doi: 10.1145/2740908.2742129
  10. Manca, S., and Ranieri, M. (2016). “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: social media in academic practices. Internet Higher Educ. 29, 63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.004
  11. Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., and Kousha, K. (2016). Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 65, 1198–1209. doi: 10.1002/asi.23477
  12. Muhammad Yousuf Ali and Joanna Richardson (2018), Usage of academic social networking sites by Karachi social science faculty:Implications for academic libraries. IFLA Journal Vol44 (1), 21-34.
  13. Oh, J. S., and Jeng, W. (2011). “Groups in academic social networking services: an exploration of their potential as a platform for multi-disciplinary collaboration,” in Paper presented at 2011 IEEE SocialCom, 9–11 October (Boston, MA). doi: 10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.202
  14. Ortega, J. L. (2017). Toward a homogenization of academic social sites: a longitudinal study of profiles in, Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate. Online Inform. Rev. 41, 812–825. doi: 10.1108/OIR-01-2016-0012
  15. Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academic social networks. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 165-169.
  16. Stephen, G, and Thanuskodi, S. (2014). Use of social Networking sites among the students of Engineering & Education College in Karaikudi: A Survey. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, Vol.3,No 4. Oct-.Dec. 2014, pp-306- 311.
  17. Thelwall, M., and Kousha, K. (2013). social network or academic network? J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 65, 721–731. doi: 10.1002/asi.23038.
  18. Yan, W., and Zhang, Y. (2018). Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: an examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed. J. Informetr. 12, 385–400. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.002


A variety of Academic Social Networking (ASN) Platforms, Including ResearchGate, and Google Scholar, have gained popularity over the past decades. A common capability of many of these academic social networking websites is to provide an online repository to which users can upload and share research papers. Now 10 years since the launch of the three main platforms which currently lead the market (, ResearchGate, and Mendeley), it is timely to review how and why ASNS are used. Recently Microsoft Academic also. These sites allow uploading academic articles, abstracts, and links to published articles; track demand for published articles, and engage in professional interaction. This study investigates the nature of the use and the perceived utility of the Academic Social Networking Sites among the LIS Professionals in the North Eastern Region in India. This study reveals that Non Teaching Professionals have knowledge of ASNSs. Google Scholar and Academia are the most used ASNSs among LIS professionals. 77.5% of the LIS Professionals indicated their preference for uploading a full-text version of their publications and 52.42% accessed the relevant ASNS at least daily.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.