Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
ORCID IDs
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2013
Citation
Collection Management 38 (2013), pp. 3-32; doi: 10.1080/01462679.2012.730494
Abstract
Numerous publications on patron-driven acquisition (PDA) for print books and similar materials have reported that patron-requested materials circulate more. Tying circulation to selector may be failing to address the complex of factors that contributes to items’ circulation. In the present study, the authors revisit a PDA program’s data and to determine whether PDA print books’ circulation advantage persists when the potential interactions of several additional variables are taken into account. As with prior studies, library patrons were significantly better predictors of circulation than were librarians or approval plans. However, librarians proved to be significantly better predictors than were approval plans.
Comments
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Used by permission.