"Do species and functional groups differ in acquisition and use of C, N" by Peter B. Reich, David Tilman et al.

Natural Resources, School of

 

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

3-30-2001

Comments

Published in New Phytologist (2001) 150 : 435–448.

Abstract

Summary:

• To evaluate whether functional groups have a similar response to global change, the responses to CO2 concentration and N availability of grassland species from several functional groups are reported here.
• Sixteen perennial grassland species from four trait-based functional groups (C3 grasses, C4 grasses, non-leguminous forbs, legumes) were grown in field mono-cultures under ambient or elevated (560 μmol mol-1) CO2using free-air CO2enrichment (FACE), in low N (unamended field soil) or high N (field soil + 4 g N m-2 years-1) treatments.
• There were no CO2 x N interactions. Functional groups responded differently to CO2 and N in terms of biomass, tissue N concentration and soil solution N. Under elevated CO2, forbs, legumes and C3grasses increased total biomass by 31%, 18%, and 9%, respectively, whereas biomass was reduced in C4-grass mono-cultures. Two of the four legume species increased biomass and total plant N pools under elevated CO2, probably due to stimulated N-fixation. Only one species markedly shifted the proportional distribution of below- vs aboveground biomass in response to CO2 or N.
• Although functional groups varied in responses to CO2and N, there was also substantial variation in responses among species within groups. These results suggest that current trait-based functional classifications might be useful, but not sufficient, for understanding plant and ecosystem responses to elevated CO2and N availability.

COinS