To exclose nests or not: structured decision making for the conservation of a threatened species

Authors

Jonathan B. Cohen, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and ForestryFollow
Anne Hecht, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Kelly F. Robinson, Cornell University, Ithaca & Michigan State University, East Lansing
Erik E. Osnas, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage
Andrew Tyre, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Christina Davis, New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, Woodbine
Alison Kocek, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse
Brooke Maslo, Rutgers University, New Brunswick
Scott M. Melvin, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2016

Citation

Cohen, J. B., A. Hecht, K. F. Robinson, E. E. Osnas, A. J. Tyre, C. Davis, A. Kocek, B. Maslo, and S. M. Melvin. 2016. To exclose nests or not: structured decision making for the conservation of a threatened species. Ecosphere 7(10):e01499. 10.1002/ecs2.1499

Comments

2016 Cohen et al.

Abstract

Decisions regarding endangered species recovery often face sparse data and multiple sources of uncertainty about the effects of management. Structured decision making (SDM) provides a framework for assembling knowledge and expert opinion and evaluating the tradeoffs between different objectives while formally incorporating uncertainty. The Atlantic Coast piping plover provides an illustrative case for the utility of SDM in endangered species management because its population growth is simple to model, most populations are monitored, decision alternatives are well defined, and many managers are open to recovery recommendations. We built a model to evaluate the decision to use nest exclosures to protect piping plover eggs from predators, where the objective was to maximize λ and the tradeoff was between nest survival and adult survival. The latter can be reduced by exclosures. We used a novel mixed multinomial logistic exposure model to predict daily nest fates and incorporated the results into a stochastic projection matrix that included renesting after nest failure, and adult mortality associated with abandonment. In our test data set (n = 329 nests from 28 sites over four years), the mean nest survival over 34 days was markedly higher for exclosed nests (0.76 ± 0.03 SE) than for unexclosed nests (0.37 ± 0.07). Abandonment rates were also higher for exclosed nests (0.092 ± 0.017) than for unexclosed nests (0.045 ± 0.017), but the difference was not statistically signifi- cant and the loss rate to “other sources” (mostly predators) was much lower for exclosed nests (0.15 ± 0.03) than for unexclosed nests (0.58 ± 0.07). Population growth rate (λ) was clearly improved by exclosure use at the sites with high background nest loss rates, but λ was still <1 with exclosure use. Where the background nest loss rates were low, the decision to use exclosures was ambiguous, and λ could benefit from reducing uncertainty in vital rates. Our process demonstrated that geographic and temporal variation in nest mortality determines whether exclosures will be useful in attaining positive population growth rates and that other management options must be considered where the background nest mortality rates are high.