Natural Resources, School of

 

Date of this Version

10-23-2022

Citation

Nandan, R.; Bandaru, V.; He, J.; Daughtry, C.; Gowda, P.; Suyker, A.E. Evaluating Optical Remote Sensing Methods for Estimating Leaf Area Index for Corn and Soybean. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs14215301

Comments

Open access.

Abstract

The leaf area index (LAI) is a key crop biophysical variable influencing many vegetation processes. Spatial LAI estimates are essential to develop and improve spatial modeling tools to monitor vegetation conditions at large regional scales. Numerous optical remote sensing methods have been explored to retrieve crop-specific LAI at a regional scale using satellite observations. However, a major challenge is selecting a method that performance well under various conditions without local scale calibration. As such, we assessed the performance of existing statistical and physical approaches, developed based on parametric, non-parametric and radiative transfer model (RTM)-look-up-table based inversion, using field observations from two geographically distant locations and Landsat 5, 7, and 8 satellite observations. These methods were implemented for corn and soybeans cultivated at two locations in the U.S (i.e., Mead, Nebraska, and Bushland, Texas). The evaluation metrics (i.e., Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Coefficient of Determination (R2)) were used to study the performance of each method, and then the methods were ranked based on these metrics. Our study showed that overall parametric methods outperformed other methods. The RMSE (MAE) for the top five methods was less than 1.3 (0.95) for corn and 1.0 (0.8) for soybeans, irrespective of location. Even though they outperformed, parametric methods exhibited inconsistency in their performance. For instance, the SR_CA_cross method ranked 1 for corn, however, it performed poorly for soybean (ranked 15). The non-parametric methods showed moderate accuracy partly due to the availability of a smaller number of observations for training. The RTM-LUT inversion physical-based approach was found to perform reasonably well RMSE (MAE) less than 1.5 (1.0) consistently irrespective of location and crop, implying that this approach is more suitable for regional-scale LAI estimation. The results of this study highlighted the drawbacks and advantages of available optical remote sensing approaches to estimate LAI for corn and soybean crops using Landsat imagery. These results are of interest for remote sensing and modeling communities developing spatial-scale approaches to model and monitor agricultural vegetation.

COinS