Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit: Staff Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Date of this Version
1997
Abstract
Variability in length-at-age estimates back-calculated from scales continues to be of concern to fishery scientists. Measurement transects used to back-calculate length at age have been recommended; however, specific scale and annuli radius measurements have not been evaluated for variability between different radii. Thus, the purpose of our study was to compare back-calculated length-at-age estimates determined from two different scale radii: one horizontally from the focus to the anterior-median edge and one diagonally from the focus to the anterior-lateral corner of the scale. No significant differences (P = 0.13 - 0.58 and P = 0.24 - 0.87) in backcalculated length-at-age estimates between the two transects were found for black crappies (Pomoxis nigromaculatus) and bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus), respectively. Statistical differences between back-calculated length-at-age estimates determined from the two transects were found for largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) at age 1 (P = 0.01), age 4 (P = 0.0001), and age 5 (P = 0.0001) and for walleyes (Stizostedion vitreum) at age 1 (P = 0.0001), age 2 (P = 0.0001), and age 3 (P = 0.0001). However, mean length-at-age estimates for largemouth bass and walleye samples differed little (0.1-6.3 mm). The small differences in mean back-calculated length-at-age estimates between these transects should not affect growth assessments. However, transect use should be standardized when precise back-calculated length-atage estimates are needed.
Comments
Published in THE PRAIRIE NATURALIST 29:4 (December 1997).