National Collegiate Honors Council
Date of this Version
Spring 2005
Abstract
In my discipline there are typically two kinds of reviews. The first is sharply critical of the author’s conclusions, argumentative techniques, and overall style. The second usually involves a brief summary of the author’s points and then goes on to engage the project in a variety of ways: some critical, some conciliatory. I choose to adopt the latter form as it seems that Digby brings to the fore issues that should concern educators in Honors.
Comments
Published in Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 6:1, Spring/Summer 2005. Copyright © 2005 by the National Collegiate Honors Council.