National Collegiate Honors Council


Date of this Version

Fall 2008


Published in Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 9:2, Fall/Winter 2008. Copyright © 2008 by the National Collegiate Honors Council.


In many countries, the training of researchers who will be internationally competitive has become a primary objective, leading to extensive discussion of the curricula, educational content, and methods that may ensure a high level of student achievement. In this global climate, only the most excellent students have the potential to engage successfully in international competition and become leading-edge researchers in the world-wide marketplace of research. Thus, any country seeking to be internationally competitive must consider ways to further raise the level of excellent students. In this study, we investigate university programs, specifically honors programs, that take special measures for training the most excellent students.

Honors programs can be found in the United States, Canada, Holland, China, Singapore, Chile, and other countries; among these, the highest number of honors programs are in the U. S. (Digby, 2005) and China. Consequently, the authors chose these two countries as the objects of this study, surveying and comparing the characteristics of honors programs as training courses for excellent students. In both countries, the focus of our study was limited to higher-level universities. In the case of China, only universities identified by Kitagaki & Fuang (2008) as “Key Chinese Universities” were investigated. A small sample of universities in the U. S. was selected from America’s Best Value Colleges (Owens & Meltzer et al., 2006). Our other major sources of information were university websites and the literature available through the National Collegiate Honors Council.

In both China and the U. S., honors programs have a common aim to gather and train particularly excellent students in the universities while the specific content of each program and training course is distinct. The characteristics observed in the two countries as well as the comparison of such characteristics may help serve as models for Japan and other countries wishing to create honors programs.