Nutrition and Health Sciences, Department of
Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences: Faculty Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
ORCID IDs
0000-0002-6069-9939
0000-0002-9576-5692
0000-0002-8010-3987
0000-0002-8298-3690
0000-0002-3799-9212
0000-0002-6686-3891
0000-0003-3504-5826
0000-0002-5384-5504
0000-0002-0758-8519
0000-0002-6186-2822
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2019
Citation
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 514
Abstract
Background: This paper describes the development and validation of the Vending Evaluation for Nutrient-Density (VEND)ing audit to comprehensively evaluate vended products based upon healthfulness, price and promotion, and machine accessibility. Methods: A novel vending nutrient-density score was created to determine the healthfulness of vended snack/beverage products. Field tested in United States colleges, VENDing audit (Σnutrient-density + 10 x % healthy products) and Support sub-scores (price + promotion + accessibility) were calculated for snack/beverage machines. Higher scores indicate more healthful vending options and supports for choosing healthfully. Nutrition Environment Measures Survey-Vending (NEMS-V) was used to validate the nutrient-density score for a sub-sample of machines. Sensitivity and specificity were computed by comparing the number of healthy snacks/beverages determined by NEMS-V and the VENDing nutrient-density scores. Results: Researchers conducted the VENDing audit on 228 snack/beverage vending machines at 9 universities within the United States and used both VENDing and NEMS-V on 33 snack and 52 beverage vending machines. Mean VENDing audit scores were 4.5 ± 2.0 (2.6, 3.4) and 2.6 ± 2.0 (0, 12) for snack/beverage machines, respectively. The number of products considered healthy assessed with both the VENDing nutrient-density scores and the NEMS-V were positively correlated for beverages (r = 0.687, p < 0.001) and snacks (r = 0.366, p < 0.05). The sensitivity was excellent for beverages (0.83) and moderate for snacks (0.69); while the specificity was moderate for both beverages (0.66) and snacks (0.50). Conclusions: The VENDing audit uses unique, valid, and
Included in
Human and Clinical Nutrition Commons, Molecular, Genetic, and Biochemical Nutrition Commons, Other Nutrition Commons
Comments
© 2019 by the authors.
Open access
doi:10.3390/ijerph16030514