Fatiguing Joint Angle Does Not Influence Torque and Neuromuscular Responses Following Sustained, Isometric Forearm Flexion Tasks Anchored to Perceptual Intensity in Men

Authors

Dolores G. Ortega, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Terry J. Housh, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Robert Smith, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Jocelyn E. Arnett, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Tyler J. Neltner, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
John Paul V. Anders, The Ohio State University
Richard J. Schmidt, University of Nebraska—LincolnFollow
Glen O. Johnson, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

8-10-2023

Citation

Ortega, D.G.; Housh, T.J.; Smith, R.W.; Arnett, J.E.; Neltner, T.J.; Anders, J.P.V.; Schmidt, R.J.; Johnson, G.O. Fatiguing Joint Angle Does Not Influence Torque and Neuromuscular Responses Following Sustained, Isometric Forearm Flexion Tasks Anchored to Perceptual Intensity in Men. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2023, 8, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jfmk8030114

Comments

Open access.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of joint angle (JA) on maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and neuromuscular responses following fatiguing tasks anchored to RPE. Nine men (mean ± SD: age = 20.7 ± 1.2 yrs) performed forearm flexion MVICs at elbow JAs of 75^o and 125^o before and after sustained, isometric forearm flexion tasks to failure at fatiguing joint angles (FJA) of 75^o and 125^o anchored to RPE = 8. The amplitude and frequency of the electromyographic and mechanomyographic signals were recorded. Neuromuscular efficiency was calculated by dividing normalized torque by normalized electromyographic amplitude. A dependent t-test was used to assess the mean difference for time to task failure (TTF) between FJA. Repeated measure ANOVAs were used to assess mean differences for pre-test to post-test MVIC and neuromuscular responses. There was no significant difference between FJA for TTF (p = 0.223). The MVIC (collapsed across FJA and MVIC JA) decreased from pre-test to post-test (51.1 ± 5.0 vs. 45.3 ± 5.6 Nm, p < 0.001). Normalized neuromuscular parameters remained unchanged (p > 0.05). The FJA resulted in similar torque and neuromuscular responses, and the decreases in MVIC were not tracked by changes in the neuromuscular parameters. Thus, the neuromuscular parameters were not sensitive to fatigue, and pre-test to post-test measures may be compared between different FJA.