Psychology, Department of
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2014
Citation
Published in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol 143, no 3 (2014), pp 1199–1213.
DOI: 10.1037/a0035177
Abstract
Recent work indicates that the more conservative one is, the faster one is to fixate on negative stimuli, whereas the less conservative one is, the faster one is to fixate on positive stimuli. The present series of experiments used the face-in-the-crowd paradigm to examine whether variability in the efficiency with which positive and negative stimuli are detected underlies such speed differences. Participants searched for a discrepant facial expression (happy or angry) amid a varying number of neutral distractors (Experiments 1 and 4). A combination of response time and eye movement analyses indicated that variability in search efficiency explained speed differences for happy expressions, whereas variability in post-selectional processes explained speed differences for angry expressions. These results appear to be emotionally mediated as search performance did not vary with political temperament when displays were inverted (Experiment 2) or when controlled processing was required for successful task performance (Experiment 3). Taken together, the present results suggest political temperament is at least partially instantiated by attentional biases for emotional material.
Included in
Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Cognitive Psychology Commons, Comparative Psychology Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2013 American Psychological Association. Used by permission.