Psychology, Department of
Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2012
Citation
Published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society 175, Part 2 (2012) in the article “Quantifying the Weight of Evidence from a Forensic Fingerprint Comparison: A New Paradigm” (pp. 371–415) in the final section “Discussion on the Paper by Neumann, Evett and Skerrett,” p. 408.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2011.01027.x
Abstract
Neumann, Evett, and Skerrett have made a major contribution to the art and science of fingerprint identification. This is an important—perhaps historic—step forward in the intellectual history of fingerprint identification and perhaps other fields of pattern matching forensic science. Their work deals ingeniously with the elusive problem of placing forensic identification on an empirically sound, quantitative foundation.
Included in
Criminology Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Psychology Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2012 Royal Statistical Society. Used by permission.