Exploring Lawyer Misconduct: An Examination of the Self-Regulation Process

Authors

Nicole Leeper Piquero, University of Texas at DallasFollow
Michele Bisaccia Meitl, University of Texas at DallasFollow
Eve M. Brank, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Jennifer L. Woolard, Georgetown UniversityFollow
Lonn Lanza-Kaduce, University of Florida, GainesvilleFollow
Alex R. Piquero, University of Texas at DallasFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2016

Citation

Deviant Behavior 37:5 (2016), pp. 573–584.

doi: 10.1080/01639625.2015.1060795

Comments

Copyright © 2016 Taylor & Francis. Used by permission.

Abstract

Although white-collar professionals are often held in high esteem, sometimes persons in privileged positions engage in misconduct. Unfortunately, very little is known about the correlates associated with professional misconduct and even less is known about the sanctioning process among lawyers who are licensed by state bar associations and therefore subject to the bar rules regulating their professional conduct. We examine 213 complaints filed in one fiscal year with the Florida Bar alleging attorney misconduct and evaluate the factors that influence whether the complaint continued through or was discarded at each stage of the self-regulated grievance process. Using selection models that examine both the staff’s decision to send a case forward to the grievance committee as well as the grievance committee’s recommendation about sanctioning the lawyer, results show that both legal and extra-legal variables are related to these two processes.