Psychology, Department of
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
3-2012
Citation
Social Issues and Policy Review 6:1 (March 2012), pp. 26–53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01034.x
Abstract
The parent-child relationship is woven deep within historical and contemporary culture, but strong retributive ideals have led to blaming parents because of their presumed vicarious role in juvenile crime. The current article will discuss the history, forms, legal challenges, and empirical research related to parental involvement laws in the United States. The parent-child relationship provides the historical framework behind the separate juvenile justice parens patriae system; however, with the juvenile justice system not as successful as originally imagined, blame has shifted to the parents. We examine the potential constitutional implications of enacting and enforcing parental involvement statutes and ordinances and also the potential efficacy of parental involvement laws in reducing juvenile delinquency. In addition, we propose empirical research to test the underlying assumptions about blame made by parental involvement laws.
Included in
Family Law Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Psychology Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2012 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues. Published by Wylie. Used by permission.