Development of Chewing in Children From 12 to 48 Months: Longitudinal Study of EMG Patterns

Authors

Jordan R. Green, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Christopher A. Moore, University of Washington, SeattleFollow
Jacki L. Ruark, University of Tennessee - Knoxville
Paula R. Rodda, University of Washington
Wendy T. Morvee, University of Washington
Marcus J. van Witzenburg, University of Washington

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

1997

Comments

Journal of Neurophysiology 77:2704-2716, 1997. Copyright 1997 The American Physiological Society. The APS does not permit archiving in an institutional repository, so a link is provided to an open-access version at PubMed Central:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9163386

http://jn.physiology.org/content/77/5/2704.long

Abstract

Developmental changes in the coordinative organization of masticatory muscles were examined longitudinally in four children over 49 experimental sessions spanning the age range of 12–48 mo. Electromyographic (EMG) records were obtained for right and left masseter muscles, right and left temporalis muscles, and the anterior belly of the digastric. Two independent analytic processes were employed, one that relied on identification of onset and offset of muscle activation and a second that used pairwise cross-correlational techniques. The results of these two analyses, which were found to be consistent with each other, demonstrated that the basic chewing pattern of reciprocally activated antagonistic muscle groups is established by 12 mo of age. Nevertheless, chewing efficiency appears to be improved through a variety of changes in the chewing pattern throughout early development. Coupling of activity among the jaw elevator muscles was shown to strengthen with maturation, and the synchrony of onset and offset of these muscles also increased. Coactivation of antagonistic muscles decreased significantly with development. This decrease in antagonistic coactivation and increase in synchrony among jaw elevators, and a parallel decrease in EMG burst duration, were taken as evidence of increased chewing efficiency. No significant differences in the frequency of chewing were found across the ages studied. Additional considerations include the appropriateness of this coordinative infrastructure for other developing oromotor skills, such as speech production. It is suggested that the relatively fixed coordinative framework for chewing exhibited by these children would not be suitable for adaptation to speech movements, which have been shown to rely on a much more variable and adjustable coordinative organization.