Statistics, Department of
Department of Statistics: Faculty Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
ORCID IDs
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2020
Citation
Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal. 2020;13:113–133.
Abstract
Often there is an uninterpretable model that is statistically as good as, if not better than, a successful interpretable model. Accordingly, if one restricts attention to interpretable models, then one may sacrifice predictive power or other desirable properties. A minimal condition for an interpretable, usually parametric, model to be better than another model is that the first should have smallermean-squared error or integratedmean-squared error.We show through a series of examples that this is often not the case and give the asymptotic forms of a variety of interpretable, partially interpretable, and noninterpretable methods. We find techniques that combine aspects of both interpretability and noninterpretability in models seem to give the best results.
Comments
© 2020 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License