Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education, Department of

 

Department of Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education: Faculty Publications

Accessibility Remediation

If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

9-2004

Citation

Teachers & Teaching: Theory and Practice (September 2004) 10(3): 329-344

Comments

Copyright 2004, Taylor and Francis. Used by permission

Abstract

This paper draws on data collected in a one-year research project focusing on elucidating theory/practice relations in learning to teach. As a teacher educator I grapple with the nature and role of teaching methodology. The notion of method, with its implied order and certainty, is confronted alongside prospective teachers throughout their coursework and student-teaching experiences. Reflexivity is considered essential to this research process, providing a means to address the interface between the empirical data collected alongside student-teachers and its interpretations. In this regard I draw on the historical writings of Dewey and Bakhtin, found to provide insights into theory/practice relations. Through Dewey’s thinking, bearings are retrieved that reorient teaching/ learning methodology toward neglected needs and opportunities in learning to teach. Through Bakhtin’s early aesthetic essays, a language is retrieved that addresses forgotten assumptions central to reformulating teaching methodology. This paper pursues the necessary character of a teacher preparation course fostering a mode of method that is radically different from the technical one. It is a mode of method that attends to the voices of prospective teachers in schools confronting the nature of learners and learning, teachers and teaching. It is a mode of method that reminds all involved in the schooling process of the power of teaching/learning restored to its participatory and complex nature.

Share

COinS