U.S. Department of Agriculture: Forest Service -- National Agroforestry Center
Document Type
Article
Citation
Chapter 7 in D.L. Peterson et al. (eds.), Climate Change and United States Forests, Advances in Global Change Research 57, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7515-2__7
Abstract
Storing carbon (C) and offsetting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions with the use of wood for energy, both of which slow emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere, present significant challenges for forest management (IPCC 2001). In the United States, there has been a net increase in C in forests and in harvested wood products stocks (Tables 7.1 and 7.2), a result of historical and recent ecological conditions, management practices, and use of forest products (Birdsey et al. 2006). However, recent projections for the forest sector suggest that annual C storage could begin to decline, and U.S. forests could become a net C emitter of tens to hundreds of Tg C year ¹ within a few decades (USDA FS 2012a). It is therefore urgent to identify effective C management strategies, given the complexity of factors that drive the forest C cycle and the multiple objectives for which forests are managed. An ideal C management activity contributes benefits beyond increasing C storage by achieving other management objectives and providing ecosystem services in a sustainable manner. Strategies for effectively managing forest C stocks and offsetting C emissions requires a thorough understanding of biophysical and social influences on the forest C cycle (Birdsey et al. 1993). Successful policies and incentives may be chosen to support strategies if sufficient knowledge of social processes (e.g., landowner or wood-user response to incentives and markets) is available. For example, if C stocks are expected to decrease owing to decreasing forest land area caused by exurban development, policies or incentives to avoid deforestation in those areas may be effective. If C stocks are expected to decrease owing to the effects of a warmer climate, reducing stand densities may retain C over the long term by increasing resilience to drought and other stressors and by reducing crown fire hazard (Jackson et al. 2005; Reinhardt et al. 2008). Protecting old forests and other forests that have high C stocks may be more effective than seeking C offsets associated with wood use, especially if those forests would recover C more slowly in an altered climate. If climate change increases productivity in a given area over a long period of time, increasing forest C stocks through intensive management and forest products, including biomass energy, may be especially effective. It is equally important to know which strategies might make some management practices unacceptable (e.g., reducing biodiversity). However, no standard evaluation framework exists to aid decision making on alternative management strategies for maximizing C storage while minimizing risks and tradeoffs. Here we discuss (1) where forest C is stored in the United States, (2) how to measure forest C through space and time, (3) effectiveness of various management strategies in reducing atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), and (4) effectiveness of incentives, regulations, and institutional arrangements for implementing C management. Understanding of biophysical and social influences on the forest C cycle (Birdsey et al. 1993). Successful policies and incentives may be chosen to support strategies if sufficient knowledge of social processes (e.g., landowner or wood-user response to incentives and markets) is available. For example, if C stocks are expected to decrease owing to decreasing forest land area caused by exurban development, policies or incentives to avoid deforestation in those areas may be effective. If C stocks are expected to decrease owing to the effects of a warmer climate, reducing stand densities may retain C over the long term by increasing resilience to drought and other stressors and by reducing crown fire hazard (Jackson et al. 2005; Reinhardt et al. 2008). Protecting old forests and other forests that have high C stocks may be more effective than seeking C offsets associated with wood use, especially if those forests would recover C more slowly in an altered climate. If climate change increases productivity in a given area over a long period of time, increasing forest C stocks through intensive management and forest products, including biomass energy, may be especially effective. It is equally important to know which strategies might make some management practices unacceptable (e.g., reducing biodiversity). However, no standard evaluation framework exists to aid decision making on alternative management strategies for maximizing C storage while minimizing risks and tradeoffs. Here we discuss (1) where forest C is stored in the United States, (2) how to measure forest C through space and time, (3) effectiveness of various management strategies in reducing atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), and (4) effectiveness of incentives, regulations, and institutional arrangements for implementing C management.
Comments
This article is a U.S. government work, and is not subject to copyright in the United States.