Can bottom-up ocean CO₂ fluxes be reconciled with atmospheric ¹³C observations?

Authors

Caroline B. Alden, University of Colorado at Boulder
John B. Miller, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Earth Systems Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL)Follow
James W. C. White, University of Colorado at Boulder

Date of this Version

2010

Comments

Published in Tellus (2010), 62B, 369–388; DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00481.x

Abstract

The rare stable carbon isotope, ¹³C, has been used previously to partition CO₂ fluxes into land and ocean components. Net ocean and land fluxes impose distinctive and predictable fractionation patterns upon the stable isotope ratio, making it an excellent tool for distinguishing between them. Historically, isotope constrained inverse methods for calculating CO₂ surface fluxes—the ‘double deconvolution’—have disagreed with bottom-up ocean flux estimates. In this study, we use the double deconvolution framework, but add, as a constraint, independent estimates of time histories of ocean fluxes to the atmospheric observations of CO₂ and ¹³CO₂. We calculate timeseries of net land flux, total disequilibrium flux and terrestrial disequilibrium flux from 1991 to 2008 that are consistent with bottom-up net ocean fluxes.We investigate possible drivers of interannual variability in terrestrial disequilibrium flux, including terrestrial discrimination, and test the sensitivity of our results to those mechanisms. We find that C₃ plant discrimination and shifts in the global composition of C₃ and C₄ vegetation are likely drivers of interannual variability in terrestrial disequilibrium flux, while contributions from heterotrophic respiration and disturbance anomalies are also possible.