Extending the Habitat Concept to the Airspace

Authors

Robert H. Diehl, Northern Rocky Mountain Science CenterFollow
Anna C. Peterson, University of Minnesota, Saint PaulFollow
Rachel T. Bolus, Southern Utah UniversityFollow
Douglas Johnson, US Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research CenterFollow

Date of this Version

2017

Citation

P.B. Chilson et al. (eds.), Aeroecology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68576-2_3

Comments

U.S. government works are not subject to copyright.

Abstract

Habitat is one of the most familiar and fundamental concepts in the fields of ecology, animal behavior, and wildlife conservation and management. Humans interact with habitats through their senses and experiences and education to such a degree that their perceptions of habitat have become second nature. For this reason, it may be difficult at first to accept the airspace as habitat, an area that is invisible, untouchable, highly dynamic, and its occupants difficult to see. Nonetheless, the habitat concept, by definition and in practice, applies readily to the airspace. Some ecological and behavioral processes including habitat selection, foraging, and reproduction are operational in the airspace, while others, particularly those mediated by resource limitation such as territoriality, are likely uncommon if present at all. The behaviors of flying animals increasingly expose them to anthropogenic hazards as development of the airspace accelerates. This exacerbates the need to identify approaches for managing these human–wildlife conflicts in aerial habitats, especially where human safety or at-risk populations are concerned. The habitat concept has proven useful in shaping environmental law and policy to help mitigate these conflicts. It remains to be seen whether current law can bend to include a more expansive concept of habitat that includes the airspace.