United States Department of Defense
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Date of this Version
2011
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of low levels of endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) supplementation on in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in a gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.
Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Military medical center. Patient(s): General in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET) population.
Intervention(s): Addition of low-dose urinary hCG to IVF stimulations using a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and GnRH antagonist protocol. Main
Outcome Measure(s): Implantation and live-birth rates.
Result(s): As part of a larger cohort of 239 patients, 42 patients with LH levels ≤0.5 mIU/mL were evaluated. In the larger cohort, there were no differences in implantation and pregnancy rates between the recombinant FSH only (n = 113) and the recombinant FSH with low-dose hCG supplementation (n = 126) groups. In the FSH-only group, patients with LH levels ≤0.5 mIU/mL had decreased implantation rates (19% vs. 42%) and live-birth rates (25% vs. 54%) as compared with patients with LH levels >0.5 mIU/mL. Low LH patients in the recombinant FSH with low-dose urinary hCG group had statistically significantly higher implantation rates (54% vs. 19%) and live-birth rates (64% vs. 25%) as compared with patients with similar low LH levels in the recombinant FSH-only group.
Conclusion(s): Endogenous LH levels ≤0.5 mIU/mL after GnRH antagonist treatment are associated with statistically significantly lower implantation and pregnancy rates in recombinant FSH-only cycles. The addition of lowdose urinary hCG results in improved implantation and live-birth rates in patients with low LH levels.
Comments
Published in Fertility and Sterility (2011) 96(4): p. 898-904; doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.069