Agricultural Research Division of IANR

 

West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte

Accessibility Remediation

If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.

Date of this Version

2004

Citation

The Professional Animal Scientist 20 (2004):384–387

Abstract

Objectives of this study were to evaluate synchronization, conception, and pregnancy rates of heifers synchronized with melengestrol acetate (MGA)-prostaglandin F (PGF,), Select Synch, or Select Synch preceded by MGA (MGA-Select Synch). Heifers in the MGA-PGF group (n = 209; BW = 378 kg) received MGA (0.5 mg/ d per heifer) for 14 d and PGF (25 mg) 19 d later. Select Synch heifers (n = 213; BW = 374 kg) received gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 μg) followed by PGF (25 mg) 7 d later. The MGA-Select Synch heifers (n = 210; BW = 373 kg) were fed MGA (0.5 mg/d per heifer) for 7 d, GnRH (100 μg) the day following the last MGA feeding, and PGF (25 mg) 7 d after GnRH. More (P2α administration in both the Select Synch (20%) and MGA-Select Synch (24%) groups than in the MGA-PGF (4%) group. Pregnancy rates for heifers in estrus early (d 1 to 4 before PGF) were greater (P2α) was greater (P2α heifers (86%) compared with Select Synch (66%) and MGA-Select Synch (68%) heifers; however, conception rate did not differ (P=0.13) and averaged 72, 63, and 62% for MGA-PGF, Select Synch, and MGASelect Synch heifers, respectively. Select Synch (52%), MGA-Select Synch (58%), and MGA-PGF protocols (61%) provided similar (P=0.18) overall AI pregnancy rates; however, more heifers were in estrus before PGF administration in protocols using GnRH.

Included in

Agriculture Commons

Share

COinS