Effect of Ignoring Random Sire and Dam Effects on Estimates and Standard Errors of Breed Comparisons

Authors

K. L. Barkhouse, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
L. Dale Van Vleck, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Larry V. Cundiff, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

January 1998

Comments

Published in J. Anim. Sci. 1998. 76:2279–2286.

Abstract

Data were weights of F₁ calves and weaning weights of top-cross progeny from sires and maternal grandsires of 13 breeds. Three analyses were performed on each trait to obtain estimates and standard errors of breed effects needed to calculate across-breed EPD and accuracies. Model (R) for records of F₁ progeny contained fixed effects for birth year and date of birth, sex, age and breed of dam, and breed of sire, and a random residual effect. The second analysis included random effects for sires (RS), and the third analysis included random effects for sires and dams (RSD). In maternal analysis of top-cross progeny, model (R_m) contained fixed effects for cycle of experiment, age of dam, year of birth, sex, breeds of maternal grandam and grandsire, and breed of sire, and a random residual effect. In addition, the second and third analyses fit random effects for maternal grandsires (RS_m) and for maternal grandsires and daughters of maternal grandsires (RSD_m) . Estimates of breed of sire effects changed only slightly for different models. Total variance increased in RSD and RS relative to R. Standard errors of breed of sire comparisons were underestimated with Model R, compared to Models RS and RSD. Standard errors of other contrasts were generally not affected. Variance components, breed effects, and standard errors followed patterns for R_m, RS_m , and RSD_m similar to those for R, RS, and RSD. Ignoring random variation due to sires and dams underestimated standard errors of breed of sire comparisons.