Animal Science, Department of
Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports
Date of this Version
2015
Citation
2015 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report, University of Nebraska—Lincoln Extension, MP101.
Abstract
Ingestion and mastication of forage samples adds ash. Generally, levels of CP were lower and NDF and IVOMD were similar for post-ingested versus pre-ingestedforage. Bag type (screen vs. solid) generally did not affect ash, NDF, or IVOMD. Bag did not affect CP of alfalfabut CP of grass samples from screen bags was lower than solid bags. More fresh than dry forage was recovered through the esophageal opening.
Included in
Large or Food Animal and Equine Medicine Commons, Meat Science Commons, Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2015 University of Nebraska.