Effects of Three Aggressive Implant Protocols on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Calf-Fed Steers

Authors

F. Henry Hilscher, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Galen E. Erickson, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Marshall N. Streeter Streeter, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Robert J. Cooper, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Bill D. Dicke, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
D. J. Jordon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Tony L. Scott, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Date of this Version

2015

Citation

2015 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report, University of Nebraska—Lincoln Extension, MP101.

Comments

Copyright © 2015 University of Nebraska.

Abstract

A commercial feedlot study compared the effects of three initial implant strategies [Revalor® 200 (Rev200), Revalor® IS (RevIS), or Revalor® XS (RevXS)] followed by a Revalor 200 terminal implant on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. No differences in final BW, DMI, ADG, or F:G were observed. The RevXS treatment resulted in larger LM area, lower calculated yield grades, less back fat, and a greater percentage of yield grade 1 carcasses. The Rev200 and the RevXS treatments had a higher percentage of carcasses that graded select compared to RevIS suggesting initial implant has little impact on feedlot performance but small effects on quality and fatness at equal days on feed.