George Eliot Review Online
Date of this Version
1988
Document Type
Article
Citation
The George Eliot Review 19 (1988)
Abstract
This is an interesting but relatively obvious analysis of four female characters of major significance in 19th century fiction. Miss Sabiston is seeking to establish whether or not there is a 'feminine creative sensibility'. She notes the heroines' similarities, and as her analysis deepens, she maintains comparison and perspective by cross-reference. Thus Emma Bovary requires change of location for her romance, whereas Emma is manifestly tied by duty to her own area and rejects any idea of moving away. The sections devoted to Dorothea Brooke advance what seems to me to be very obvious arguments. The chapter, as with the others, consists of a series of short essays which preclude detailed investigation: there is also a tendency to be speculative, for example, to consider what Dorothea might have been had she lived in the second half of this century. There is some good close analysis throughout, particularly on the importance of interiors, but the overall effect is one of fragmentation rather than of independent and integrated analysis. There is a neat and deft touch with some of the essays, but one gets the feeling that segments of summary and quotation are no substitute for demonstrably sensitive critical investigation at depth.
Included in
Comparative Literature Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Women's Studies Commons
Comments
Published by The George Eliot Review Online https://GeorgeEliotReview.org