Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Date of this Version
3-7-2018
Document Type
Article
Citation
Alhalhouli, Zaid., Zainuddin., Der, Chen Soong. (2014). Factors Affecting Knowledge sharing Behavior among Stakeholders in Jordanian Hospitals Using Social Networks. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 3 (5), Page 919.
Amriani, Tenry Nur. (2014). Knowledge Management (Km) Dalam Organisasi Publik. Diakses pada 4 Maret 2017, from http://www.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/berita-makassar/19407-knowledge-management-km-dalam-organisasi-publik
Baron, Stephen.,Tonkiss, Fran., Savage, Mike., Tampubolon, Gindo., Warde, Alan. (ed.). (2004). Politics, Trust and Networks: Social Capital in Critical Perspective (Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group). London: London South Bank University.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, James S. “Social capital in the Creation of Human Capital”. American Journal of Sociology 94, (1988): 95-120.
Dalkir, Kimiz. (2005). Knowledge Management and Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.
Idrus, Muhammad. (2009). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What do Firms do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organitation Science. 7, page. 503.
Muneer, Saqib., Iqbal, Syed Muhammad Javed., Khan, Saif Nur Rehman., Long, Choi Sang. (2014). An Incorporated Structure of Perceived Organizational Support, Knowledge-Sharing Behavior, Organizational Trust and Organizational Commitment: A Strategic Knowledge Management Approach. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8 (1), page 52.
Nahapiet, Janine & Ghosal, Sumantra. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Jstore (The Academy of Management Review), 23 (2), page 242-266.
Nohria, N., & Eccles, R (Eds.). Networks and Organizations; Structure, Form and Actions. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Rachmat, Antonius. 2014. Menjadi Pustakawan di Era Perpustakaan Digital dengan Memanfaatkan Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan. Diakses pada 8 Maret 2017, dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263833266_Menjadi_Pustakawan_di_Era_Perpustakaan_Digital_dengan_Sistem_Informasi_Perpustakaan
Sangkala. (2007). Knowledge Management (Suatu pengantar memahami bagaimana organisasi mengelola pengetahuan sehingga menjadi organisasi yang unggul). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Setiarso, Bambang. (2006). (Knowledge Management) Knowledge sharing dan Penciptaan Pengetahuan. Diakses pada 10 Maret 2017, dari http://dev.perpusnas.go.id/assets/uploads/2016/02/4_artikel_bambang_setiarso_knowledge_mngmt.pdf
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuanitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tangaraja, Gangeswari., Rasdi, Roziah Mohd., Samah, Bahaman Abu., & Ismail, Maimunah. (2016). Knowledge sharing is knowledge Transfer: a misconception in the literature. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20 (4), page. 659.
Tobing, Paul L. (2007). Knowledge Management (konsep, arsitektur dan implementasi). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Uphoff, Norman. (2000). “Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation,” in P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin (eds). Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
Yiu, Maria & Law, Rab. (2012). Factors Influencing Knowledge sharing Behavior: A Social-Psychological View In Tourism. Service Science. 3 (2), page. 12.
Abstract
Research in university library is very important as a means of improving the quality of the library. There are relations of social networks that can facilitate the communication traffic between the librarians, who can create knowledge sharing behavior as a strategy or way used for a library purpose. This study aims to analyze the dimensions of Social Capital Theory (structural, relational, and cognitive) which use case study in qualitative approach. The number of informants in this study were 7 librarians, and data analysis technique based on the theoretical framework in order to discuss new findings in library setting. The result shows 4 difference of librarians behavior, which are optimistic cognitive behavior, defensive affective behavior, pessimistic affective behavior, and pessimistic cognitive behavior. Fourth behavioral differences arise from the attitude of librarians in assessing the activities of knowledge sharing. Librarians who have good intention, positive reinforcement, aware of the importance to foster ideas and innovation for the library through the knowledge sharing, behaves as an optimistic cognitive librarian. For who have no intention that grows within itself in the activities of knowledge sharing, because they feel less agree with these materials or a series of activities carried out in these activities, reluctant to convey his ideas to be share, categorized as librarian with defensive affective behavior. If librarian have intention, positive support in the form of interest, but less aware and optimal in cultivating ideas and innovation for the library through the knowledge sharing, is a librarian who behaves pessimistic affective. While librarians who have no intention and less aware of the importance of ideas and innovation in the knowledge sharing activities is a librarian who behaves pessimistic cognitive.