Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Document Type
Article
Citation
Bansal, A. (2013). DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(5), 412-417.
Bansal, A. (2014). DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information technology: A Bibliometric analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information technology, 33(5), 412-417. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.33.5.5108
Deshmukh, P. P. (2011). Citation in Annals of Library and Information Studies from 1997 to 2010: A study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58, 355-361.
Govindaradjou, S., & John, D. (2014).Quantitative analysis of research trend in a leading ecological journal: Bibliometric study during 2003-2012. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 80(1), 27-40.
Ganganna, C. (2017) A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Academic Librarianship for the period of 2012-2016. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 7(3)
Gudodagi, S. C. (2014). PEARL - A Journal of Library and Information study. e-Library Science Research Journal, 2(11), 1-5.
Krishnamoorthy G, Ramakrishnan J, Devi S(2009), Bibiliometrics analysis of literature on diabetes during 1995-2004. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 6: p150-155
P, Kannan and S, Thanuskodi, (2019) Bibliometric Analysis of Library Philosophy and Practice: A study based on Scopus Database. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2300.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2300
Library Philosophy and practice website (2019)https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/
Mondal, D., Kanamadi, S., & Das, K. (2017). Contribution by an Indian author in Foreign Library and Information Science Journals during 2006-2015: a Scientometrics study. DESIDOCJournal of Library & Information Technology, 37(6), 396-402.
Moyon, N. T., &Shukla, A. (2017). Research Output Analysis of International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology (IJIDT) through Bibliometric Approach. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1604, 1-14. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1604
Reddy A, H (2017). Scientometric analysis of “IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing: 2013-2016. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 7(3)
Shijith Kumar, C. and Nanjunda Swamy, M. (2016). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing: 1970-2015. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 6(4), 145-156.
Verma, Manoj Kumar; Yadav, Sunil Kumar; and Singh, S N. (2018) Research Publication Pattern of Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): A Bibliometric Analysis during 2008-2017" (2018). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1836. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1836
Verma, Anjali; Sonkar, Sharad Kumar; and Gupta, Vibha (2015) A Bibliometric Study of The Library Philosophy And Practice (E-Journal) For The Period 2005-2014. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1292. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1292.
Abstract
The present study is based on the Bibliometrics analysis of the articles published in Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal) for the period 2014–2018. During this period, a total of 1046 scholarly papers have been published by LIS researchers around the world. The study analyzes the documents based on various bibliometric aspects like year wise contribution of articles, year wise growth of publication, average publication per author, subject wise distribution of articles, the geographical distribution of articles, authorship pattern, author productivity, degree of collaboration, reference distribution pattern and length of reference distribution. In all with an average 209.2 articles were published each year and the highest numbers (421) of articles were published in 2018. From the 35 of the world contributed countries Nigeria is in top rank with 36.33% contributions. Two authorship is leading authorship trend, and also Multi-Authored has shown the unique number of contribution with the 0. 71 rates of the degree of collaboration.