Mathematics, Department of
Department of Mathematics: Faculty Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
1941
Abstract
The identity
(1) Σn=1∞ (qn)/[(1-qn)2] {(1÷(1-q)) + (1÷(1-q2)) + … + (1 ÷ (1 -qn))} = Σn=1∞ [(n2qn)
was deduced from arithmetical considerations by E. T. Bell. About five years ago, W. N. Bailey proved the relation
(2) Σn=0∞ [(1-q)(1-q2)…(1-qn] ÷ [(1-z)(1-qz)…(1-qnz)] x [(zn + 1) ÷ (1 - qn +1] = Σn=0∞ [(qnz) ÷ (1-qnz)2],
from which he obtained (1) by differentiating with respect to z and then putting z = q. A short time later Hall gave an alternate proof of (2) by simply specializing the parameters in a relation between basic series.
Comments
Published in Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 (1941) 781-784.