Nebraska Local Technical Assistance Program
Nebraska Department of Transportation: Research Reports
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
ORCID IDs
0000-0002-6695-9842 (Khattak)
0000-0003-1914-1041 (Zhao)
0009-0000-6743-5728 (Dzawu)
Date of this Version
4-2026
Document Type
Article
Citation
Khattak, A., Zhao, L., and Selase Dzawu, F. (2026). "Guidance for Left-Turn Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) Implementation in Nebraska", NDOT Research Report SPR-FY24(037).
Abstract
This research evaluates the safety performance of flashing yellow arrows (FYA) and driver behavioral responses in Nebraska, using data from 324 FYA intersections (Lincoln 160; Omaha 164) to develop evidence-based implementation guidance. The study addresses critical knowledge gaps in local driver acceptance patterns, the effectiveness of phasing configurations, and a comprehensive safety assessment that integrates crash and conflict analyses. The methodology employed four complementary analyses: (1) negative binomial crash frequency modeling of 3945 unique left turn crashes (2015-2024) across Lincoln and Omaha; (2) binary logistic regression of 948 gap acceptance decisions across 43 intersections; (3) linear regression of post-encroachment time for 613 completed left turns; and (4) detailed video investigation of 18 crashes at three Omaha intersections with lead-lag FYA phasing. Results demonstrate no statistically significant overall crash increase post-FYA installation when controlling for exposure (Lag: Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]=0.937, p=0.364; Lead: IRR=1.027, p=0.563), though aggregate trends were influenced by five high-volume outlier intersections. Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers revealed lag phasing produced a statistically significant 15.1% reduction in crashes (IRR=0.849, p=0.038). Perceived Yellow Trap" (PYT) phenomenon, where lead-lag phasing configurations created perceptual confusion during phase transitions, accounting for 72% of observed crashes. Gap acceptance analysis showed lag phasing associated with 10% shorter critical gaps (3.85s vs. 4.28s), enabling higher operational efficiency. Recommended operational thresholds include prioritizing lag phasing at high-exposure locations, refining exposure thresholds using cross-product metrics, optimizing signal timing, and time-of-day operation. When properly implemented and following the recommended operational thresholds, FYA installation should improve intersection safety.