Agronomy and Horticulture, Department of
Root Absorption and Xylem Translocation
Document Type
Learning Object
Date of this Version
2003
Citation
Plant and Soil Sciences eLibrary (PASSeL) Lesson
Abstract
Overview
Plant roots and below-ground shoots have few barriers to herbicide absorption; however, interactions with soil particles and soil organic matter have significant impacts on the amount of herbicide available for plant absorption. Plant roots and below-ground shoots (hypocotyls or coleoptiles) are lipophilic by nature and do not have thick, waxy cuticles like leaves. Lipophilic and hydrophilic herbicides reach the root surface by bulk transport in soil water; however, there are a few examples of herbicides that reach the root as a vapor. Soil-applied herbicides can translocate to the shoot or remain in the root system. Soil-applied herbicides that translocate to the shoot in the xylem tend to accumulate in mature leaves that transpire the most water. The herbicide’s lipophilic/hydrophilic nature will determine if the herbicide translocates to the shoot. Foliar absorption and translocation of phloem-mobile herbicides will be discussed in a separate lesson.
Objectives
At the completion of this lesson, learners will have acquired the information necessary to understand the following:
- How clay content, organic matter, and soil pH influence herbicide availability.
- How herbicides move to the root and how chemical characteristics of the herbicide can be used to predict root absorption.
- How chemical characteristics influence herbicide translocation to the shoot.
- Pathways and barriers to herbicide movement from root to shoot.
Modules:
- Lesson home
- Root Absorption and Xylem Translocation Overview and Objectives
- Root Absorption of Herbicides
- Pathways for Root Absorption
- Herbicide Interactions with Soil Organic Matter and Clay
- Herbicide Translocation to the Shoot
- Predicting Root Absorption and Translocation Based on Herbicide Characteristics
- Videos
Comments
Copyright © 2003 Scott J. Nissen, Tracy M. Sterling, and Deana Namuth. Used by permission.
This project was supported in part by the National Research Initiative Competitive Grants CAP project 2011-68002-30029 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, administered by the University of California-Davis and by the National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Undergraduate Education, National SMETE Digital Library Program, Award #0938034, administered by the University of Nebraska. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA or NSF.