Political Science, Department of
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2014
Citation
Ha and Oh: Selective versus comprehensive emergency management in Korea. SpringerPlus 2014 3:602.
Abstract
In spite of Korean governments’ efforts, many emergency management practitioners wonder whether what is actually being practiced is selective or comprehensive management. Using a qualitative content analysis and experiences in practice, the article analyzes the barriers to selective emergency management and the paths to comprehensive emergency management via the same three management elements: stakeholders, phases of the emergency management lifecycle, and hazards and impacts. Four analytical levels are considered: central government level, industry level, community level, and household level. Korea, despite its self-praise, has to transform its selective emergency management into comprehensive emergency management in time.
Comments
© 2014 Ha and Oh; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.