Microclimatic Performance of a Free-Air Warming and CO₂ Enrichment Experiment in Windy Wyoming, USA

Authors

Daniel LeCain, USDA-ARSFollow
David Smith, USDA-ARS
Jack Morgan, USDA-ARS
Bruce A. Kimball, USDA-ARSFollow
Elise Pendall, University of Western SydneyFollow
Franco Miglietta, Istituto di Biometeorologia, via Giovanni Caproni 8

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2014

Citation

LeCain D, Smith D, Morgan J, Kimball BA, Pendall E, Miglietta F (2015) Microclimatic Performance of a Free-Air Warming and CO₂ Enrichment Experiment in Windy Wyoming, USA. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0116834.

Comments

Open Access.

Abstract

In order to plan for global changing climate experiments are being conducted in many countries, but few have monitored the effects of the climate change treatments (warming, elevated CO₂) on the experimental plot microclimate. During three years of an eight year study with year-round feedback-controlled infra-red heater warming (1.5/3.0°C day/night) and growing season free-air CO₂ enrichment (600 ppm) in the mixed-grass prairie of Wyoming, USA, we monitored soil, leaf, canopy-air, above-canopy-air temperatures and relative humidity of control and treated experimental plots and evaluated ecologically important temperature differentials. Leaves were warmed somewhat less than the target settings (1.1 & 1.5°C day/night) but soil was warmed more creating an average that matched the target settings extremely well both during the day and night plus the summer and winter. The site typically has about 50% bare or litter covered soil, therefore soil heat transfer is more critical than in dense canopy ecosystems. The Wyoming site commonly has strong winds (5 ms^-1 average) and significant daily and seasonal temperature fluctuations (as much as 30°C daily) but the warming system was nearly always able to maintain the set temperatures regardless of abiotic variation. The within canopy-air was only slightly warmed and above canopy- air was not warmed by the system, therefore convective warming was minor. Elevated CO₂ had no direct effect nor interaction with the warming treatment on microclimate. Relative humidity within the plant canopy was only slightly reduced by warming. Soil water content was reduced by warming but increased by elevated CO₂. This study demonstrates the importance of monitoring the microclimate in manipulative field global change experiments so that critical physiological and ecological conclusions can be determined. Highly variable energy demand fluctuations showed that passive IR heater warming systems will not maintain desired warming for much of the time.