Is Soil Temperature Better than Air Temperature for Predicting Winter Wheat Phenology?

Authors

Gregory S. McMaster, USDA-ARSFollow
Wallace Wilhelm, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

September 1998

Comments

Published in AGRONOMY JOURNAL, VOL. 90, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 1998.

Abstract

In predicting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phenology, logic suggests that basing thermal unit accumulation on near-surface soil temperature should give a better representation of shoot apex thermal unit accumulation than air temperature until internode elongation raises the apex above the soil surface. A study was undertaken to determine if predictions of winter wheat phenology are improved when based on measured near-surface soil temperature rather than air temperature. Air temperature 1.5 m above the soil surface and soil temperature at crown depth (the position of the shoot apex before stem elongation) were collected for 23 site-years across the U.S. Central Great Plains representing a range of cultivars, soils, management practices, and climates. Seven site-years from different sites were randomly selected to calculate the mean thermal units from both seeding and 1 January to specific growth stages based on both air and soil temperature. These means were used to predict occurrence of growth stages for the remaining 16 site-years. In no instance did soil temperature significantly improve prediction of winter wheat phenology. From these results, we conclude that the additional effort and expense of using soil temperature in predicting winter wheat phenology are not justified.