"Conserving Biodiversity in Human-Dominated Landscapes" by Dale D. Goble, J. Michael Scott et al.

US Geological Survey

 

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2006

Citation

Published in The Endangered Species Act at Thirty, Volume 2: Conserving Biodiversity in Human-Dominated Landscapes, edited by J. Michael Scott, Dale D. Goble, & Frank W. Davis (Washington: Island Press, 2006), pp. 288-290.

Abstract

The two volumes of The Endangered Species Act at Thirty look backward to evaluate the effectiveness of the act over its first three decades (Wilcove and McMillan 2006; Scott et al. 2006, chap. 2; Goble, this volume; Svancara, this volume; Callicott, this volume; Norton, this volume) and also forward to suggest how it can be used as a cornerstone for conserving biological diversity in increasingly human-dominated landscapes (Davis et al. 2006; Bean 2006). The chapters in part 2 of this volume, for example, appraise the science of the 1990s and 2000s at both the large scale (Lomolino, this volume; Naeem et al. , this volume; Naeem and Jouseau, this volume) and the small (Waples, this volume; Haig and Allendorf, this volume; Reed et al., this volume) and examine the current debate over how science should inform the policy decisions that the act necessarily raises (Doremus, this volume; Ruckelshaus and Darm, this volume). As the authors note, conserving biodiversity involves more than science. The landscapes are, after all, human dominated-and as such must be human managed. The chapters in part 3 evaluate the issues that human management raise, its costs and benefits (Shogren, this volume; Sunding, this volume), emerging mechanisms that may offer tools to reduce the conflict by shifting increasingly to incentives (Scott et al., this volume; Heal, this volume; Fox et al., this volume), and an assessment of the potential to conserve biodiversity across a variety of sea- and landscapes (Armsworth, this volume; Brosi et al., this volume; Beatley, this volume).

Share

COinS