The Limits of Judicial Review in Constitutional Adjudication

Authors

Wallace M. Rudolph, University of Puget Sound School of LawFollow
Janet L. Rudolph

Abstract

Constitutional adjudication presently requires that in order for a party to challenge a governmental act he must claim that the act has violated his constitutional rights. The purpose of this article is to show that such a requirement undermines constitutional limits on governmental actions and is inconsistent with a proper interpretation of the Constitution.

I. Introduction

II. The Police Power

III. The Government Operations Power

IV. The Law Declaration Power

V. Conclusion

Recommended Citation

Wallace M. Rudolph and Janet L. Rudolph, The Limits of Judicial Review in Constitutional Adjudication, 63 Neb. L. Rev. (1984)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol63/iss1/4