The Possible Future of Private Rights of Action for Proxy Fraud: The Parallel between Borak and Wilko

Authors

C. Steven Bradford, University of Nebraska College of LawFollow

Abstract

I. Introduction

II. Wilko v. Swan

III. The Subsequent Treatment of Wilco ... A. Chipping at the Foundation ... B. Rejecting the Wilko Analysis ... C. The Death of Wilko—Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

IV. J. I. Case Co. v. Borak

V. The Subsequent Treatment of Borak ... A. Chipping at the Foundation ... B. Rejecting the Borak Analysis

VI. Will Borak Survive? Possible Distinctions ... A. Changed Circumstances ... B. Wilko's Inconsistency with McMahon ... C. The Supreme Court's Other Proxy Fraud Opinions

VII. Conclusion

VIII. Postscript

Recommended Citation

C. Steven Bradford, The Possible Future of Private Rights of Action for Proxy Fraud: The Parallel between Borak and Wilko, 70 Neb. L. Rev. (1991)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol70/iss2/7