II. A Curious Way of Doing Things
III. Why Do Students Join Law Reviews?
IV. Is Criticism of Law Reviews Justified or Is It “Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing?”
V. From Practical to Theoretical Legal Scholarship
VI. Yet Another Accusation: Law Reviews Are the Cause of the Supreme Court’s Poor Literary Style
VII. A Final Complaint: A Great Deal of Law Review Language Is Incomprehensible
VIII. Expert Testimony in Opposition to Abolishing Law Reviews
IX. A Possible But Unlikely Change of Circumstances
Richard S. Harnsberger,
Reflections about Law Reviews and American Legal Scholarship,
76 Neb. L. Rev.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol76/iss4/3