Article Title
Abstract
I. Introduction … A. The Facts of Parham … B. The Decision …
II. Defining the Interests … A. Private Interests—Parent and Child … B. Risk of Error and Value of Additional Safeguards … C. Governmental Interests
III. Balancing the Interests
IV. The Hidden Issue—The Doctrine of the Least Restrictive Alternative
V. Conclusion
Recommended Citation
James Herbsleb,
Institutionalization of Juveniles: What Process Is Due? Parham v. J.R., —U.S.—, 99 S. Ct. 2493 (1979),
59 Neb. L. Rev.
(1980)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol59/iss1/12
COinS