Abstract
I. Introduction
II. The Hancock Decision … A. Facts … B. Holding
III. Analysis … A. “Crashworthiness” or Causation? … B. “Unreasonably Dangerous” after Hancock … C. Dissent’s Charges Examined … 1. Defect and the Danger … 2. Paccar Not an Insurer
IV. Conclusion
Recommended Citation
Kent Campbell,
Friedrich II: Nebraska Takes a Closer Look at Automotive Design Defect: Hancock v. Paccar, Inc., 204 Neb. 468, 283 N.W.2d 25 (1979),
59 Neb. L. Rev.
(1980)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol59/iss2/13
COinS