The Constitutionality of State Residency Requirements for Attorneys under the Privileges and Immunities Clause: The Attack Continues: Gordon v. Committee on Character and Fitness, 48 N.Y.2d 266, 397 N.E.2d 1309, 422 N.Y.S.2d 641 (1979)

Authors

Tim Binder, University of Nebraska College of Law

Abstract

I. Introduction

II. Facts of Gordon

III. Analysis … A. The Privileges and Immunities Clause … B. The Tests Applied … C. Analysis of the Application … 1. Is the Legal Profession within the Ambit of the Clause? … 2. State Residency Requirements and Substantial Equality … 3. Special Problems Presented by nonresident Attorneys … 4. Closely Tailored Residency Requirements to the Evil Presented

IV. Conclusion

Recommended Citation

Tim Binder, The Constitutionality of State Residency Requirements for Attorneys under the Privileges and Immunities Clause: The Attack Continues: Gordon v. Committee on Character and Fitness, 48 N.Y.2d 266, 397 N.E.2d 1309, 422 N.Y.S.2d 641 (1979), 60 Neb. L. Rev. (1981)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol60/iss1/9