Abstract
I. Introduction . . . . . 1288
II. Factual Background of Brandon . . . . . 1290
III. Relevant Law: The Legal Framework of IIED in Nebraska . . . . . 1296
A. Section 46 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts . . . . . 1296
B. Past IIED Claims Brought Before the Nebraska Supreme Court . . . . . 1298
IV. Analysis of Brandon ex rel. Estate of Brandon v. County of Richardson . . . . . 1301
A. Brandon Is Generally Within the Parameters of Section 46 . . . . . 1302
B. The Court's Emphasis on Laux's Tone of Voice Is Questionable . . . . . 1304
C. "Extreme and Outrageous Conduct" in Nebraska: Just How Slippery Does Brandon Make the Slope? . . . . . 1305
1. Concerns of a Slippery Slope Quieted: Section 46 Stands Strong . . . . . 1306
2. Uncertain but Predictable: Language-Based Conduct and the Future of IIED in Nebraska . . . . . 1310
V. Conclusion . . . . . 1312
Recommended Citation
Matthew M. Munderloh,
Nebraska's (More or Less) Stable Approach to "Extreme and Outrageous Conduct" and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Brandon ex rel. Estate of Brandon v. County of Richardson, 261 Neb. 636, 624 N.W.2d 604 (2001),
81 Neb. L. Rev.
(2002)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol81/iss3/9