Abstract
I. Introduction . . . . . 576
II. Case Progression . . . . . 579
A. Factual Background . . . . . 579
B. District Court Decision . . . . . 583
C. Nebraska Supreme Court Decision . . . . . 586
III. Analysis . . . . . 587
A. Overview of Nebraska Case Law . . . . . 587
1. Preliminary Look at Section 32-553 in State ex rel. Steinke v. Lautenbaugh . . . . . 587
2. Meaning of “Most Recent Census Data” Answered in Pelzer v. Bellevue . . . . . 588
B. The Question of Frequency . . . . . 590
C. One-Person, One-Vote Standard: Reynolds v. Sims . . . . . 592
D. Federal Courts and the Frequency Question ....... 593
E. Nebraska Constitutional Guidance . . . . . 595
F. Other Statutory Guides: Redistricting Due to Annexation . . . . . 599
G. Potential Results: Ohio’s Experience . . . . . 601
IV. Implications . . . . . 602
V . Conclusion . . . . . 605
Recommended Citation
David J. A. Bargen,
The Frequency of Redistricting in Nebraska and the Balance Between One Person, One Vote and Electoral Stability: How Often Is Too Often?,
82 Neb. L. Rev.
(2003)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol82/iss2/7