Nebraska Law Review

Article Title

Judge Koh’s Monopolization Mania: Her Novel Antitrust Assault Against Qualcomm Is an Abuse of Antitrust Theory

Authors

Richard A. Epstein, New York University School of lawFollow

Abstract

I. Introduction: A Blockbuster Decision

II. The Typology of Antitrust Offenses ... A. Per Se Offenses ... B. Rule of Reason Cases ... C. Per Se Legality or “No-Duty” Rules

III. FTC v. Qualcomm ... A. The Complaint and the Ohlhausen Dissent ... B. The Monopolization Issue ... C. Market Definition ... D. Trinko and the Antitrust Duty to Deal ... E. Qualcomm’s Pricing Policy—The Use of Constant Rates ... F. The FTC Valuation Dilemma … G. Qualcomm Efficiency Justifications

IV. Conclusion

Recommended Citation

Richard A. Epstein, Judge Koh’s Monopolization Mania: Her Novel Antitrust Assault Against Qualcomm Is an Abuse of Antitrust Theory, 98 Neb. L. Rev. 241 (2019)
Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol98/iss2/2