
American Judges Association
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review is published quarterly by the American Judges Association (AJA)
Editors: Professor Eve Brank, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Judge David D. Dreyer, Marion Superior Court, Indiana; Judge David Prince, Colorado State District Court
Managing Editor: Charles F. Campbell, National Center For State Courts Staff
ISBN: 0011-0647
Copyright © American Judges Association
2014
Research Report: How Litigants Evaluate Legal Procedures at the Start of Their Cases, Dr. Donna Shestowsky
Should the Science of Adolescent Brain Development Inform Public Policy?, Laurence Steinberg
Scrutinizing Confessions in a New Era of Juvenile Jurisprudence, Joshua A. Tepfer, Laura H. Nirider, and Steven A. Drizin
Cell Phones and Everything Else: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2013-2014 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
President’s Column (2015) 50 Page 111, Elliott Zide
President’s Column: THE RELATIONSHIP OF LEADERSHIP, JUDICIAL EDUCATION, AND JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE, Elliott Zide
2013
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 1, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 2, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 3, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 4, Editor's Note
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 3
The Resource (2013) 49 Page 160
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 120
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 204
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 72
MINDING THE COURT: ENHANCING THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS, Pamela Casey, Kevin Burke, and Steve Leben
Addressing Implicit Bias in the Courts, Pamela M. Casey, Roger K. Warren, Fred L. Cheesman, and Jennifer K. Elek
National Consortium on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts Celebrates 25 Years, Edward C. Clifton and H. Clifton Grandy
Actual Versus Perceived Performance of Judges, Theodore Eisenberg, Talia Fisher, and Issi Rosen-Zvi
First, Do No Harm: On Addressing the Problem of Implicit Bias in Juror Decision Making, Jennifer K. Elek and Paula Hannaford-Agor
Improving Judicial- Performance Evaluation: Countering Bias and Exploring New Methods, Jennifer K. Elek and David B. Rottman
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 75, Toni M. Higginbotham
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 123, Toni Manning Higginbotham
Utilization of Rules 614 and 706 in Fact-Finding: A Recent Study of Midwest Judges, Andrew W. Jurs
Achieving Racial and Ethnic Fairness in Drug Courts, Douglas B. Marlowe
The Emotionally Intelligent Judge: A New (and Realistic) Ideal, Terry A. Maroney
Knowing the Communities We Serve, Liana Fiol Matta
The Court’s Brain: Neuroscience and Judicial Decision Making in Criminal Sentencing, Kimberly Papillon
Heuristics and Biases in Judicial Decisions, Eyal Peer and Eyal Gamliel
More than Marriage Civil Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2012-2013 Term, Todd E. Pettys
The Third Branch of the Third Sovereign: A Brief History of Tribal Courts and Their Perception in the Supreme Court, Keith Richotte Jr.
Who Are You Going to Believe?, Richard Schauffler and Kevin S. Burke
The Supreme Court’s Emerging Jurisprudence on the Punishment of Juveniles: Legal and Policy Implications, Joanna L. Visser and Jeffrey L. Shook
DNA, Dogs, the Nickel, and Other Curiosities: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2012 2013 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
President’s Column: WE’RE IN TOUCH, SO YOU BE IN TOUCH, Elliott Zide
2012
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 48, Issue 4, Editor's Note
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Table of Contents)
Healthcare, Unions, Ministers, and More: Civil Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 Term
Judges and Wrongful Convictions
On the Constitutionality of Mandatory Pretrial DNA Tests on Those Arrested or Indicted for a Felony
Jury Instructions on Witness Identification, Brian H. Bornstein and Joseph A. Hamm
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
Ready for the Psychologists: Learning from Eyewitness Errors, James M. Doyle
Repeated Information in the Courtroom, Jeffrey L. Foster, Maryanne Garry, and Elizabeth F. Loftus
Memory Conformity Between Eyewitnesses, Fiona Gabbert, Daniel B. Wright, Amina Memon, Elin M. Skagerberg, and Kat Jamieson
President’s Column, Toni M. Higginbotham
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Increasing Court-Appearance Rates and Other Benefits of Live-Caller Telephone Court-Date Reminders: The Jefferson County, Colorado, FTA Pilot Project and Resulting Court Date Notification Program, Timothy R. Schnacke, Michael R. Jones, and Dorian M. Wilderman
Eyewitness-Identification Evidence: Scientific Advances and the New Burden on Trial Judges, Laura Smalarz and Gary L. Wells
An Experiment in the Law: Studying a Technique to Reduce Failure to Appear in Court, Alan Tomkins, Brian H. Bornstein, Mitchel Norman Herian, David I. Rosenbaum, and Elizabeth Neeley
Editor's Note, Alan J. Tomkins
Opinions as the Voice of the Court: How State Supreme Courts Can Communicate Effectively and Promote Procedural Fairness, William C. Vickrey, Douglas G. Denton, and Wallace B. Jefferson
GPS Monitoring and More: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
A Method for Analyzing the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony in Criminal Cases, Richard A. Wise and Martin A. Safer
2011
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 4 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 4 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Table of Contents)
The International Criminal Court: Our Differences in Jurisprudence, David Admire
High-Profile Cases: Are They More Than a Wrinkle in the Daily Routine?, Robert Alsdorf
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
On Courts and Communication Strategies: Book Review of Pamela D. Schulz, Courts and Judges on Trial: Analysing and Managing the Discourses of Disapproval, Andrew J. Cannon
President’s Column, Mary Celeste
Should Judges Worry About the “CSI Effect”?, Simon A. Cole and Rachel Dioso-Villa
Is Procedural Fairness Applicable to All Courts?, Victor E. Flango
Reading, Writing, and Interrogating: Providing Miranda Warnings to Students in Schoolhouse Interrogations, Stephanie Forbes