AJA members receive a subscription to Court Review. Non-member subscriptions are available for $35 per volume (four issues per volume).
Points of view or opinions expressed in Court Review are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the positions of the National Center for State Courts or the American Judges Association.
ISSN: 0011-0647
Editors: Professor Eve Brank, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Judge David D. Dreyer, Marion Superior Court, Indiana; Judge David Prince, Colorado State District Court
Managing Editor: Charles F. Campbell, National Center For State Courts Staff:
Editorial Assistant: Emma Marshall, University of Nebraska
Law Student Editors: Margaret Fouberg, University of Nebraska, Brooklyn Terrill, University of Nebraska, Sydney Pabelico, University of Nebraska, Tyler Lyon, University of Nebraska
Editorial Board: Kelly Lynn Anders, Kansas City, Missouri; Chief Judge Karen Arnold-Burger, Kansas Court of Appeals; Pamela Casey, PhD, National Center for State Courts; Judge B. Michael Dann, National Institute of Justice; Judge Julie Kunce Field, Fort Collins, Colorado; Judge John Irwin, Nebraska Court of Appeals; Judge Leslie G. Johnson, American Institute for Justice; Steven Lubet, Northwestern University; Judge Gregory E. Mize, Washington, DC; Elizabeth Neeley, PhD, University of Nebraska; David Rottman, PhD, National Center for State Courts
Editors Emeritus: Steven Leben, University of Missouri-Kansas City; Alan Tomkins, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Designer: Michael Fairchild, m-Design Studio
Copyright ©, American Judges Association.
2014
President’s Column: THE RELATIONSHIP OF LEADERSHIP, JUDICIAL EDUCATION, AND JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE, Elliott Zide
2013
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 1, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 2, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 3, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 4, Editor's Note
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 3
The Resource (2013) 49 Page 160
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 120
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 204
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 72
MINDING THE COURT: ENHANCING THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS, Pamela Casey, Kevin Burke, and Steve Leben
Addressing Implicit Bias in the Courts, Pamela M. Casey, Roger K. Warren, Fred L. Cheesman, and Jennifer K. Elek
National Consortium on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts Celebrates 25 Years, Edward C. Clifton and H. Clifton Grandy
Actual Versus Perceived Performance of Judges, Theodore Eisenberg, Talia Fisher, and Issi Rosen-Zvi
First, Do No Harm: On Addressing the Problem of Implicit Bias in Juror Decision Making, Jennifer K. Elek and Paula Hannaford-Agor
Improving Judicial- Performance Evaluation: Countering Bias and Exploring New Methods, Jennifer K. Elek and David B. Rottman
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 75, Toni M. Higginbotham
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 123, Toni Manning Higginbotham
Utilization of Rules 614 and 706 in Fact-Finding: A Recent Study of Midwest Judges, Andrew W. Jurs
Achieving Racial and Ethnic Fairness in Drug Courts, Douglas B. Marlowe
The Emotionally Intelligent Judge: A New (and Realistic) Ideal, Terry A. Maroney
Knowing the Communities We Serve, Liana Fiol Matta
The Court’s Brain: Neuroscience and Judicial Decision Making in Criminal Sentencing, Kimberly Papillon
Heuristics and Biases in Judicial Decisions, Eyal Peer and Eyal Gamliel
More than Marriage Civil Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2012-2013 Term, Todd E. Pettys
The Third Branch of the Third Sovereign: A Brief History of Tribal Courts and Their Perception in the Supreme Court, Keith Richotte Jr.
Who Are You Going to Believe?, Richard Schauffler and Kevin S. Burke
The Supreme Court’s Emerging Jurisprudence on the Punishment of Juveniles: Legal and Policy Implications, Joanna L. Visser and Jeffrey L. Shook
DNA, Dogs, the Nickel, and Other Curiosities: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2012 2013 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
President’s Column: WE’RE IN TOUCH, SO YOU BE IN TOUCH, Elliott Zide
2012
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 48, Issue 4, Editor's Note
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Table of Contents)
Healthcare, Unions, Ministers, and More: Civil Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 Term
Judges and Wrongful Convictions
On the Constitutionality of Mandatory Pretrial DNA Tests on Those Arrested or Indicted for a Felony
Jury Instructions on Witness Identification, Brian H. Bornstein and Joseph A. Hamm
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
Ready for the Psychologists: Learning from Eyewitness Errors, James M. Doyle
Repeated Information in the Courtroom, Jeffrey L. Foster, Maryanne Garry, and Elizabeth F. Loftus
Memory Conformity Between Eyewitnesses, Fiona Gabbert, Daniel B. Wright, Amina Memon, Elin M. Skagerberg, and Kat Jamieson
President’s Column, Toni M. Higginbotham
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Increasing Court-Appearance Rates and Other Benefits of Live-Caller Telephone Court-Date Reminders: The Jefferson County, Colorado, FTA Pilot Project and Resulting Court Date Notification Program, Timothy R. Schnacke, Michael R. Jones, and Dorian M. Wilderman
Eyewitness-Identification Evidence: Scientific Advances and the New Burden on Trial Judges, Laura Smalarz and Gary L. Wells
An Experiment in the Law: Studying a Technique to Reduce Failure to Appear in Court, Alan Tomkins, Brian H. Bornstein, Mitchel Norman Herian, David I. Rosenbaum, and Elizabeth Neeley
Editor's Note, Alan J. Tomkins
Opinions as the Voice of the Court: How State Supreme Courts Can Communicate Effectively and Promote Procedural Fairness, William C. Vickrey, Douglas G. Denton, and Wallace B. Jefferson
GPS Monitoring and More: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
A Method for Analyzing the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony in Criminal Cases, Richard A. Wise and Martin A. Safer
2011
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 4 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 4 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Table of Contents)
The International Criminal Court: Our Differences in Jurisprudence, David Admire
High-Profile Cases: Are They More Than a Wrinkle in the Daily Routine?, Robert Alsdorf
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
On Courts and Communication Strategies: Book Review of Pamela D. Schulz, Courts and Judges on Trial: Analysing and Managing the Discourses of Disapproval, Andrew J. Cannon
President’s Column, Mary Celeste
Should Judges Worry About the “CSI Effect”?, Simon A. Cole and Rachel Dioso-Villa
Is Procedural Fairness Applicable to All Courts?, Victor E. Flango
Reading, Writing, and Interrogating: Providing Miranda Warnings to Students in Schoolhouse Interrogations, Stephanie Forbes
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Ten Tips for Judges Dealing with the Media, Steve Leben
Addressing Nonsystematic Factors Contributing to the Underrepresentation of Minorities as Jurors, Elizabeth Neeley
Creating a New Generation of Courts, Brian Ostrom, Roger Hanson, and Kevin Burke