American Judges Association
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review is published quarterly by the American Judges Association (AJA)
Editors:
Professor Eve M. Brank, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Judge David D. Dreyer, Marion Superior Court, Indiana
Hon. Reba Ann Page, United States Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
ISBN: 0011-0647
Copyright © American Judges Association
2014
Research Report: How Litigants Evaluate Legal Procedures at the Start of Their Cases, Dr. Donna Shestowsky
Scrutinizing Confessions in a New Era of Juvenile Jurisprudence, Joshua A. Tepfer, Laura H. Nirider, and Steven A. Drizin
Should the Science of Adolescent Brain Development Inform Public Policy?, Laurence Steinberg
The Admissibility of Brain Scans in Criminal Trials: The Case of Positron Emission Tomography, Susan E. Rushing
The Filing and Briefing of Cross-Motions in State and Federal Court, Michael G. Langan and Jason C. Halpin
The Resource Page (2014) 50 Page 108
The Resource Page (2014) 50 Page 160
The Resource Page (2014) 50 Page 40
The Resource Page: Focus on Self-Represented Litigants (2014) 50 Page 212
The Status of NeuroLaw: A Plea for Current Modesty and Future, Cautious Optimism, Stephen J. Morse
2013
Achieving Racial and Ethnic Fairness in Drug Courts, Douglas B. Marlowe
Actual Versus Perceived Performance of Judges, Theodore Eisenberg, Talia Fisher, and Issi Rosen-Zvi
Addressing Implicit Bias in the Courts, Pamela M. Casey, Roger K. Warren, Fred L. Cheesman, and Jennifer K. Elek
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:1 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:2 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:3 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Contents
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Tittle Page
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 49:4 (2013)- Whole Issue
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 1, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 2, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 3, Editor's Note
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 49, Issue 4, Editor's Note
DNA, Dogs, the Nickel, and Other Curiosities: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2012 2013 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
First, Do No Harm: On Addressing the Problem of Implicit Bias in Juror Decision Making, Jennifer K. Elek and Paula Hannaford-Agor
Heuristics and Biases in Judicial Decisions, Eyal Peer and Eyal Gamliel
Improving Judicial- Performance Evaluation: Countering Bias and Exploring New Methods, Jennifer K. Elek and David B. Rottman
Knowing the Communities We Serve, Liana Fiol Matta
MINDING THE COURT: ENHANCING THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS, Pamela Casey, Kevin Burke, and Steve Leben
More than Marriage Civil Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2012-2013 Term, Todd E. Pettys
National Consortium on Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts Celebrates 25 Years, Edward C. Clifton and H. Clifton Grandy
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 123, Toni Manning Higginbotham
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 3
President’s Column (2013) 49 Page 75, Toni M. Higginbotham
President’s Column: WE’RE IN TOUCH, SO YOU BE IN TOUCH, Elliott Zide
The Court’s Brain: Neuroscience and Judicial Decision Making in Criminal Sentencing, Kimberly Papillon
The Emotionally Intelligent Judge: A New (and Realistic) Ideal, Terry A. Maroney
The Resource (2013) 49 Page 160
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 120
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 204
The Resource Page (2013) 49 Page 72
The Supreme Court’s Emerging Jurisprudence on the Punishment of Juveniles: Legal and Policy Implications, Joanna L. Visser and Jeffrey L. Shook
The Third Branch of the Third Sovereign: A Brief History of Tribal Courts and Their Perception in the Supreme Court, Keith Richotte Jr.
Utilization of Rules 614 and 706 in Fact-Finding: A Recent Study of Midwest Judges, Andrew W. Jurs
Who Are You Going to Believe?, Richard Schauffler and Kevin S. Burke
2012
A Method for Analyzing the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony in Criminal Cases, Richard A. Wise and Martin A. Safer
An Experiment in the Law: Studying a Technique to Reduce Failure to Appear in Court, Alan Tomkins, Brian H. Bornstein, Mitchel Norman Herian, David I. Rosenbaum, and Elizabeth Neeley
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Volume 48, Issue 4, Editor's Note
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issue 3 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 48, Issues 1-2 (Table of Contents)
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Editor's Note, Alan J. Tomkins
Eyewitness-Identification Evidence: Scientific Advances and the New Burden on Trial Judges, Laura Smalarz and Gary L. Wells
GPS Monitoring and More: Criminal Law Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 Term, Charles D. Weisselberg
Healthcare, Unions, Ministers, and More: Civil Cases in the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 Term
Increasing Court-Appearance Rates and Other Benefits of Live-Caller Telephone Court-Date Reminders: The Jefferson County, Colorado, FTA Pilot Project and Resulting Court Date Notification Program, Timothy R. Schnacke, Michael R. Jones, and Dorian M. Wilderman
Judges and Wrongful Convictions
Jury Instructions on Witness Identification, Brian H. Bornstein and Joseph A. Hamm
Memory Conformity Between Eyewitnesses, Fiona Gabbert, Daniel B. Wright, Amina Memon, Elin M. Skagerberg, and Kat Jamieson
On the Constitutionality of Mandatory Pretrial DNA Tests on Those Arrested or Indicted for a Felony
Opinions as the Voice of the Court: How State Supreme Courts Can Communicate Effectively and Promote Procedural Fairness, William C. Vickrey, Douglas G. Denton, and Wallace B. Jefferson
President’s Column, Kevin S. Burke
President’s Column, Toni M. Higginbotham
Ready for the Psychologists: Learning from Eyewitness Errors, James M. Doyle
Repeated Information in the Courtroom, Jeffrey L. Foster, Maryanne Garry, and Elizabeth F. Loftus
2011
Addressing Nonsystematic Factors Contributing to the Underrepresentation of Minorities as Jurors, Elizabeth Neeley
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 3 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 4 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issue 4 (Table of Contents)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Complete)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Cover)
Court Review, Volume 47, Issues 1-2 (Table of Contents)
Creating a New Generation of Courts, Brian Ostrom, Roger Hanson, and Kevin Burke
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Editor's Note, Steve Leben
Editor's Note, Alan J. Tomkins
Fact or Fiction? The Myth and Reality of the CSI Effect, Steven M. Smith, Veronica Stinson, and Marc W. Patry
High-Profile Cases: Are They More Than a Wrinkle in the Daily Routine?, Robert Alsdorf
Is Procedural Fairness Applicable to All Courts?, Victor E. Flango
Lawyer-Assistance-Program Attorneys and the Practice of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, David B. Wexler